San Jose State

Spartans · 3–9 in 2025–26

Compare San Jose State with…
Fan Score
507.4
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
1,563
2025–26 season
Positive share
50.7%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
26.2
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects San Jose State fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • San Jose State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • San Jose State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive50.7%793
Neutral6.8%106
Negative39.1%611
Mixed3.4%53
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Jan 17Low: −30% · L 10–55 at NevadaAug 29: L 14–16 vs Central MichiganLSep 6: L 7–38 at TexasLSep 20: W 31–28 vs IdahoWSep 27: L 29–30 at StanfordLOct 3: W 35–28 vs New MexicoWOct 11: L 28–35 at WyomingLOct 17: L 25–30 at Utah StateLNov 1: W 45–38 vs HawaiiWNov 8: L 16–26 vs Air ForceLNov 15: L 10–55 at NevadaLNov 22: L 3–25 at San Diego StateLNov 29: L 14–41 vs Fresno StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+81%27132L 14–16 vs Central Michigan
2025-08-30−15%5779151No game
2025-09-06+29%532791L 7–38 at Texas
2025-09-13+20%11720No game
2025-09-20+78%62672W 31–28 vs Idaho
2025-09-27+17%7048129L 29–30 at Stanford; W 35–28 vs New Mexico
2025-10-04+87%1214135No game
2025-10-11−11%5570138L 28–35 at Wyoming; L 25–30 at Utah State
2025-10-18−29%265599No game
2025-10-25+55%16422No game
2025-11-01+47%551878W 45–38 vs Hawaii
2025-11-08+7%433790L 16–26 vs Air Force
2025-11-15−30%52103171L 10–55 at Nevada
2025-11-22−22%4878137L 3–25 at San Diego State
2025-11-29−3%5154117L 14–41 vs Fresno State
2025-12-06+50%518No game
2025-12-13−3%131435No game
2025-12-20+20%325No game
2025-12-27No comments000No game
2026-01-03+61%14318No game
2026-01-10+67%8012No game
2026-01-17+100%303No game
Mood climbed for 4 straight weeks after the week of Dec 13, gaining 103 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 29: L 14–16 vs Central MichiganLSep 6: L 7–38 at TexasLSep 20: W 31–28 vs IdahoWSep 27: L 29–30 at StanfordLOct 3: W 35–28 vs New MexicoWOct 11: L 28–35 at WyomingLOct 17: L 25–30 at Utah StateLNov 1: W 45–38 vs HawaiiWNov 8: L 16–26 vs Air ForceLNov 15: L 10–55 at NevadaLNov 22: L 3–25 at San Diego StateLNov 29: L 14–41 vs Fresno StateLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2384.4%3.1%32
2025-08-3037.7%52.3%151
2025-09-0658.2%29.7%91
2025-09-1355%35%20
2025-09-2086.1%8.3%72
2025-09-2754.3%37.2%129
2025-10-0489.6%3%135
2025-10-1139.9%50.7%138
2025-10-1826.3%55.6%99
2025-10-2572.7%18.2%22
2025-11-0170.5%23.1%78
2025-11-0847.8%41.1%90
2025-11-1530.4%60.2%171
2025-11-2235%56.9%137
2025-11-2943.6%46.2%117
2025-12-0662.5%12.5%8
2025-12-1337.1%40%35
2025-12-2060%40%5
2025-12-270%0%0
2026-01-0377.8%16.7%18
2026-01-1066.7%0%12
2026-01-17100%0%3

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm18.6 per 1,000 · 29
Personal Attacks 23Harm Wish 3Group Hate 5Sexual Content 1
Identity-Based Abuse7.7 per 1,000 · 12
Gender 4Race 1Physical Appearance 7
Explicit Language29.4 per 1,000 · 46
Explicit Words 41Explicit Acronym 6
College Sports28.8 per 1,000 · 45
Conference Realignment 10Recruiting 7NIL 17Transfer Portal 14
Off-Field Storylines39 per 1,000 · 61
Injuries 24Broadcast & Media 27Officiating 8Politics & Activism 1Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting6.4 per 1,000 · 10
Gambling 7Prop Bet 2Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office156.1 per 1,000 · 244
Coaching 163Crowd & Attendance 23Stadium Experience 32Opponent Respect 5Front Office 6Opponent Hostility 21

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

46 explicit comments29.4 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words41
  • Explicit Acronym6

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 29.4 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 26.2112.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Aug 30)LLWLWLLWLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230L 14–16 vs Central Michigan
2025-08-30112.6No game
2025-09-0622L 7–38 at Texas
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-2013.9W 31–28 vs Idaho
2025-09-2738.8L 29–30 at Stanford; W 35–28 vs New Mexico
2025-10-040No game
2025-10-110L 28–35 at Wyoming; L 25–30 at Utah State
2025-10-1830.3No game
2025-10-250No game
2025-11-0112.8W 45–38 vs Hawaii
2025-11-0811.1L 16–26 vs Air Force
2025-11-1535.1L 10–55 at Nevada
2025-11-2221.9L 3–25 at San Diego State
2025-11-2917.1L 14–41 vs Fresno State
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 112.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Aug 30)) against a season average of 26.2 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks23
  • Group Hate5
  • Harm Wish3
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance7
  • Gender4
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Go Spartans! Let’s get win 1.

positiveFacebook

Rams got it done! Blue and gold all around!

positiveFacebook

Nice how the clock kept running when Hawai’i receivers went out of bounds in the 4th

negativeOfficiatingFacebook

Nice to see Lamar get a TD. BUT, the Defense needs to make those tackles when they have Barnes trapped behind the LOS

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.