Missouri

Tigers · 8–5 in 2025–26

Fan Score
542.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
15,149
2025–26 season
Positive share
54.2%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
26.5
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Missouri fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Explicit Language: 7th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 92nd percentile · Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Missouri Harm: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri Explicit Language: 7th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri College Sports: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri Off-Field Storylines: 92nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Missouri Team & Front Office: 48th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive54.2%8,216
Neutral11.8%1,794
Negative32%4,844
Mixed1.9%295

Signature subtags

What Missouri fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.3×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 2.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

8.7 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
2×

Mentioned Injuries at 2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

12.1 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.9×

Mentioned Student Section at 1.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+70%+35%−35%−70%0%Peak: +66% · W 42–31 vs KansasLow: −15% · L 7–13 vs VirginiaAug 28: W 61–6 vs C ArkansasWSep 6: W 42–31 vs KansasWSep 13: W 52–10 vs LouisianaWSep 20: W 29–20 vs South CarolinaWSep 27: W 42–6 vs UMassWOct 11: L 24–27 vs AlabamaLOct 18: W 23–17 (2OT) at AuburnWOct 25: L 10–17 at VanderbiltLNov 8: L 17–38 vs Texas A&MLNov 15: W 49–27 vs Mississippi StateWNov 22: L 6–17 at OklahomaLNov 29: W 31–17 at ArkansasWDec 27: L 7–13 vs VirginiaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+43%430135684W 61–6 vs C Arkansas
2025-08-30+50%22653345No game
2025-09-06+66%724118923W 42–31 vs Kansas
2025-09-13+50%30466477W 52–10 vs Louisiana
2025-09-20+49%439116665W 29–20 vs South Carolina
2025-09-27+31%323153548W 42–6 vs UMass
2025-10-04+59%15822231No game
2025-10-11−5%4595101,085L 24–27 vs Alabama
2025-10-18+31%6613221,111W 23–17 (2OT) at Auburn
2025-10-25−0%4314341,001L 10–17 at Vanderbilt
2025-11-01+39%8228137No game
2025-11-08−3%4755061,170L 17–38 vs Texas A&M
2025-11-15+48%7212101,072W 49–27 vs Mississippi State
2025-11-22−13%4666281,241L 6–17 at Oklahoma
2025-11-29+24%6283651,108W 31–17 at Arkansas
2025-12-06+25%358190672No game
2025-12-13+41%20771332No game
2025-12-20+43%303103468No game
2025-12-27−15%5127201,399L 7–13 vs Virginia
2026-01-03+48%15243227No game
2026-01-10+45%9224151No game
2026-01-17+37%6527102No game
Fan mood fell 64 points the week they lost by 3 to Alabama.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%39%78%Aug 28: W 61–6 vs C ArkansasWSep 6: W 42–31 vs KansasWSep 13: W 52–10 vs LouisianaWSep 20: W 29–20 vs South CarolinaWSep 27: W 42–6 vs UMassWOct 11: L 24–27 vs AlabamaLOct 18: W 23–17 (2OT) at AuburnWOct 25: L 10–17 at VanderbiltLNov 8: L 17–38 vs Texas A&MLNov 15: W 49–27 vs Mississippi StateWNov 22: L 6–17 at OklahomaLNov 29: W 31–17 at ArkansasWDec 27: L 7–13 vs VirginiaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2362.9%19.7%684
2025-08-3065.5%15.4%345
2025-09-0678.4%12.8%923
2025-09-1363.7%13.8%477
2025-09-2066%17.4%665
2025-09-2758.9%27.9%548
2025-10-0468.4%9.5%231
2025-10-1142.3%47%1,085
2025-10-1859.5%29%1,111
2025-10-2543.1%43.4%1,001
2025-11-0159.9%20.4%137
2025-11-0840.6%43.2%1,170
2025-11-1567.3%19.6%1,072
2025-11-2237.6%50.6%1,241
2025-11-2956.7%32.9%1,108
2025-12-0653.3%28.3%672
2025-12-1362.3%21.4%332
2025-12-2064.7%22%468
2025-12-2736.6%51.5%1,399
2026-01-0367%18.9%227
2026-01-1060.9%15.9%151
2026-01-1763.7%26.5%102

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm22.7 per 1,000 · 344
Personal Attacks 330Group Hate 11Sexual Content 3Harm Wish 4
Identity-Based Abuse3.8 per 1,000 · 57
Gender 10Age 15LGBTQIA+ 2Disability 12Physical Appearance 15Race 4
Explicit Language5.6 per 1,000 · 85
Explicit Emoji 4Explicit Words 31Explicit Acronym 46Violent Language 4
College Sports22.6 per 1,000 · 343
Recruiting 107Transfer Portal 132NIL 80Band 13Student Section 19Conference Realignment 17
Off-Field Storylines46.7 per 1,000 · 708
Injuries 184Broadcast & Media 216Politics & Activism 4Officiating 317Player Conduct 1
Sports Betting2.8 per 1,000 · 42
Prop Bet 6Gambling 34Moneyline 1Parlay 1
Team & Front Office121.9 per 1,000 · 1,846
Coaching 1,456Opponent Respect 54Opponent Hostility 155Crowd & Attendance 79Stadium Experience 77Athletic Department 6Front Office 45

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

7th percentile
85 explicit comments5.6 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym46
  • Explicit Words31
  • Explicit Emoji4
  • Violent Language4

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 5.6 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 94th of 100 nationally, the 7th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 26.5117.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWWWWLWLLWLWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2330.7W 61–6 vs C Arkansas
2025-08-300No game
2025-09-069.8W 42–31 vs Kansas
2025-09-134.2W 52–10 vs Louisiana
2025-09-209W 29–20 vs South Carolina
2025-09-2725.5W 42–6 vs UMass
2025-10-044.3No game
2025-10-1126.7L 24–27 vs Alabama
2025-10-1813.5W 23–17 (2OT) at Auburn
2025-10-2531L 10–17 at Vanderbilt
2025-11-0114.6No game
2025-11-0821.4L 17–38 vs Texas A&M
2025-11-1517.7W 49–27 vs Mississippi State
2025-11-2243.5L 6–17 at Oklahoma
2025-11-2956W 31–17 at Arkansas
2025-12-0628.3No game
2025-12-1312No game
2025-12-2021.4No game
2025-12-2742.2L 7–13 vs Virginia
2026-01-038.8No game
2026-01-1033.1No game
2026-01-17117.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 117.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 26.5 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks330
  • Group Hate11
  • Harm Wish4
  • Sexual Content3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age15
  • Physical Appearance15
  • Disability12
  • Gender10
  • Race4
  • LGBTQIA+2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

GO TIGERS📣 Many blessings to all 🙌🏼💛🖤

positiveFacebook

CONGRATULATIONS Hardy Boy

positiveFacebook

He will never make us great. Regardless how good the guy can recruit . . he's not an in-game manager. He doesn't know how to adjust in game nor how to manage a clock!

negativeCoachingFacebook

I knew the defense would show up! I knew with a bye and 2 weeks to prepare The offense would still struggle. ...just run the ball at this point..maybe the safety's come up even closer there close to line now

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.