South Florida

Bulls · 9–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
608.6
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
16,469
2025–26 season
Positive share
60.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
36.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects South Florida fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Sports Betting: 11th percentile · Team & Front Office: 89th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • South Florida Harm: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida Identity-Based Abuse: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida Explicit Language: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida College Sports: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida Sports Betting: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Florida Team & Front Office: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive60.9%10,023
Neutral9.7%1,596
Negative26.9%4,423
Mixed2.6%427

Signature subtags

What South Florida fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.1×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 2.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

4 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.7×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

147 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.7×

Mentioned Player Conduct at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+80%+40%−40%−80%0%Peak: +72% · W 48–13 vs Florida AtlanticLow: −15% · L 38–41 at NavyAug 28: W 34–7 vs Boise StateWSep 6: W 18–16 at FloridaWSep 13: L 12–49 at MiamiLSep 20: W 63–14 vs SC StateWOct 3: W 54–26 vs CharlotteWOct 10: W 63–36 at North TexasWOct 18: W 48–13 vs Florida AtlanticWOct 25: L 31–34 at MemphisLNov 6: W 55–23 vs UTSAWNov 15: L 38–41 at NavyLNov 22: W 48–18 at UABWNov 29: W 52–3 vs RiceWDec 17: L 10–24 vs Old DominionLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+47%481148712W 34–7 vs Boise State
2025-08-30+54%23055322No game
2025-09-06+57%2,2515073,043W 18–16 at Florida
2025-09-13+35%519230831L 12–49 at Miami
2025-09-20+65%31452402W 63–14 vs SC State
2025-09-27+47%18524339W 54–26 vs Charlotte
2025-10-04+63%36567474W 63–36 at North Texas
2025-10-11+63%595106773No game
2025-10-18+72%43048530W 48–13 vs Florida Atlantic
2025-10-25−3%166176371L 31–34 at Memphis
2025-11-01+60%35469473W 55–23 vs UTSA
2025-11-08+69%35248443No game
2025-11-15−15%214297561L 38–41 at Navy
2025-11-22+37%264105434W 48–18 at UAB
2025-11-29+30%1,5777582,692W 52–3 vs Rice
2025-12-06−3%1,1611,2552,867No game
2025-12-13−6%242275580L 10–24 vs Old Dominion
2025-12-20+35%612796No game
2025-12-27−10%212758No game
2026-01-03+15%181126367No game
2026-01-10+49%29549No game
2026-01-17+25%311852No game
Fan mood fell 83 points the week they lost by 3 at Navy.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%41%81%Aug 28: W 34–7 vs Boise StateWSep 6: W 18–16 at FloridaWSep 13: L 12–49 at MiamiLSep 20: W 63–14 vs SC StateWOct 3: W 54–26 vs CharlotteWOct 10: W 63–36 at North TexasWOct 18: W 48–13 vs Florida AtlanticWOct 25: L 31–34 at MemphisLNov 6: W 55–23 vs UTSAWNov 15: L 38–41 at NavyLNov 22: W 48–18 at UABWNov 29: W 52–3 vs RiceWDec 17: L 10–24 vs Old DominionLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2367.6%20.8%712
2025-08-3071.4%17.1%322
2025-09-0674%16.7%3,043
2025-09-1362.5%27.7%831
2025-09-2078.1%12.9%402
2025-09-2754.6%7.1%339
2025-10-0477%14.1%474
2025-10-1177%13.7%773
2025-10-1881.1%9.1%530
2025-10-2544.7%47.4%371
2025-11-0174.8%14.6%473
2025-11-0879.5%10.8%443
2025-11-1538.1%52.9%561
2025-11-2260.8%24.2%434
2025-11-2958.6%28.2%2,692
2025-12-0640.5%43.8%2,867
2025-12-1341.7%47.4%580
2025-12-2063.5%28.1%96
2025-12-2736.2%46.6%58
2026-01-0349.3%34.3%367
2026-01-1059.2%10.2%49
2026-01-1759.6%34.6%52

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm30.1 per 1,000 · 495
Personal Attacks 462Group Hate 19Sexual Content 17Harm Wish 11
Identity-Based Abuse6 per 1,000 · 99
Gender 19LGBTQIA+ 18Physical Appearance 31Age 8Disability 19Race 6Religion 1
Explicit Language31.7 per 1,000 · 522
Explicit Words 421Explicit Emoji 22Explicit Acronym 90Violent Language 6
College Sports19.7 per 1,000 · 324
Recruiting 128Band 17Transfer Portal 71NIL 38Conference Realignment 66Student Section 14
Off-Field Storylines19.7 per 1,000 · 324
Broadcast & Media 167Politics & Activism 2Officiating 75Player Conduct 16Injuries 65
Sports Betting2.1 per 1,000 · 34
Gambling 29Moneyline 4Prop Bet 1
Team & Front Office194.6 per 1,000 · 3,205
Opponent Respect 122Coaching 2,421Athletic Department 2Crowd & Attendance 195Opponent Hostility 380Stadium Experience 93Front Office 49

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

72nd percentile
522 explicit comments31.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words421
  • Explicit Acronym90
  • Explicit Emoji22
  • Violent Language6

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 31.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 29th of 100 nationally, the 72nd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 36.1134.6 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 17)WWLWWWWLWLWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2315.4W 34–7 vs Boise State
2025-08-3015.5No game
2025-09-0621.4W 18–16 at Florida
2025-09-1346.9L 12–49 at Miami
2025-09-2019.9W 63–14 vs SC State
2025-09-2714.7W 54–26 vs Charlotte
2025-10-0410.5W 63–36 at North Texas
2025-10-1116.8No game
2025-10-1822.6W 48–13 vs Florida Atlantic
2025-10-2527L 31–34 at Memphis
2025-11-0114.8W 55–23 vs UTSA
2025-11-089No game
2025-11-1569.5L 38–41 at Navy
2025-11-2223W 48–18 at UAB
2025-11-2939W 52–3 vs Rice
2025-12-0660No game
2025-12-1362.1L 10–24 vs Old Dominion
2025-12-2072.9No game
2025-12-27120.7No game
2026-01-0373.6No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-17134.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 134.6 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 17)) against a season average of 36.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks462
  • Group Hate19
  • Sexual Content17
  • Harm Wish11
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Physical Appearance31
  • Disability19
  • Gender19
  • LGBTQIA+18
  • Age8
  • Race6
  • Religion1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

So glad you changed Radio partners Now we won’t get bumped off by lightning games 

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

I wanna play for the bulls

positiveFacebook

I was hoping he came to Gainesville

negativeCoachingFacebook

While I am sad to see him leave Ohio State it is great to see him land at my Alma Mater.

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.