Oklahoma

Sooners · 10–3 in 2025–26

Fan Score
524.9
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
76,815
2025–26 season
Positive share
52.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
51.3
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Oklahoma fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 96th percentile · College Sports: 7th percentile · Explicit Language: 87th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Oklahoma Harm: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Identity-Based Abuse: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Explicit Language: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma College Sports: 7th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Off-Field Storylines: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Sports Betting: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Team & Front Office: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive52.5%40,323
Neutral10.3%7,892
Negative35.4%27,204
Mixed1.8%1,396

Signature subtags

What Oklahoma fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
3.2×

Mentioned Injuries at 3.2× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

19.6 per 1,000 comments
Explicit Language
1.8×

Mentioned Violent Language at 1.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.1 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
1.7×

Mentioned Age at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

1.5 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +58% · L 24–34 vs AlabamaLow: −35% · L 26–34 vs Ole MissAug 30: W 35–3 vs Illinois StWSep 6: W 24–13 vs MichiganWSep 13: W 42–3 at TempleWSep 20: W 24–17 vs AuburnWOct 4: W 44–0 vs Kent StateWOct 11: L 6–23 vs TexasLOct 18: W 26–7 at South CarolinaWOct 25: L 26–34 vs Ole MissLNov 1: W 33–27 at TennesseeWNov 15: W 23–21 at AlabamaWNov 22: W 17–6 vs MissouriWNov 29: W 17–13 vs LSUWDec 19: L 24–34 vs AlabamaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+56%484102687No game
2025-08-30+27%1,8089143,354W 35–3 vs Illinois St
2025-09-06+47%3,0909504,559W 24–13 vs Michigan
2025-09-13+45%1,6905472,530W 42–3 at Temple
2025-09-20+0%3,2893,2627,520W 24–17 vs Auburn
2025-09-27+27%9614931,717No game
2025-10-04+51%2,4466773,497W 44–0 vs Kent State
2025-10-11−27%1,7443,2335,589L 6–23 vs Texas
2025-10-18+15%1,3439582,630W 26–7 at South Carolina
2025-10-25−35%1,2192,8074,492L 26–34 vs Ole Miss
2025-11-01+15%2,8752,0285,714W 33–27 at Tennessee
2025-11-08+42%7832731,207No game
2025-11-15+32%4,6172,1617,592W 23–21 at Alabama
2025-11-22+18%2,7881,8455,243W 17–6 vs Missouri
2025-11-29+19%3,9302,5227,323W 17–13 vs LSU
2025-12-06+38%1,9897773,231No game
2025-12-13+58%2,5655703,443L 24–34 vs Alabama
2025-12-20−29%1,3682,6564,454No game
2025-12-27+12%6953131No game
2026-01-03+50%11435159No game
2026-01-10+42%563191896No game
2026-01-17+52%588150847No game
Fan mood fell 87 points the week of Dec 20.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%75%Aug 30: W 35–3 vs Illinois StWSep 6: W 24–13 vs MichiganWSep 13: W 42–3 at TempleWSep 20: W 24–17 vs AuburnWOct 4: W 44–0 vs Kent StateWOct 11: L 6–23 vs TexasLOct 18: W 26–7 at South CarolinaWOct 25: L 26–34 vs Ole MissLNov 1: W 33–27 at TennesseeWNov 15: W 23–21 at AlabamaWNov 22: W 17–6 vs MissouriWNov 29: W 17–13 vs LSUWDec 19: L 24–34 vs AlabamaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2370.5%14.8%687
2025-08-3053.9%27.3%3,354
2025-09-0667.8%20.8%4,559
2025-09-1366.8%21.6%2,530
2025-09-2043.7%43.4%7,520
2025-09-2756%28.7%1,717
2025-10-0469.9%19.4%3,497
2025-10-1131.2%57.8%5,589
2025-10-1851.1%36.4%2,630
2025-10-2527.1%62.5%4,492
2025-11-0150.3%35.5%5,714
2025-11-0864.9%22.6%1,207
2025-11-1560.8%28.5%7,592
2025-11-2253.2%35.2%5,243
2025-11-2953.7%34.4%7,323
2025-12-0661.6%24%3,231
2025-12-1374.5%16.6%3,443
2025-12-2030.7%59.6%4,454
2025-12-2752.7%40.5%131
2026-01-0371.7%22%159
2026-01-1062.8%21.3%896
2026-01-1769.4%17.7%847

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm43.1 per 1,000 · 3,312
Group Hate 145Harm Wish 51Personal Attacks 3,083Sexual Content 141Violent Threat 7
Identity-Based Abuse8.2 per 1,000 · 628
Disability 119Age 112Gender 178LGBTQIA+ 85Physical Appearance 119Race 40Religion 5
Explicit Language39.9 per 1,000 · 3,063
Explicit Acronym 484Explicit Emoji 59Explicit Words 2,535Violent Language 85
College Sports8.1 per 1,000 · 624
Band 55Conference Realignment 110NIL 144Recruiting 162Student Section 30Transfer Portal 140
Off-Field Storylines52.7 per 1,000 · 4,051
Broadcast & Media 893Injuries 1,509Officiating 1,646Player Conduct 25Politics & Activism 17
Sports Betting2.6 per 1,000 · 203
Gambling 166Moneyline 14Parlay 3Prop Bet 21
Team & Front Office137.3 per 1,000 · 10,550
Coaching 5,323Crowd & Attendance 657Front Office 61Opponent Hostility 3,677Opponent Respect 457Athletic Department 15Stadium Experience 518

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

87th percentile
3,063 explicit comments39.9 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words2,535
  • Explicit Acronym484
  • Violent Language85
  • Explicit Emoji59

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 39.9 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 14th of 100 nationally, the 87th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 51.390.9 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Dec 20)WWWWWLWLWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2326.2No game
2025-08-3054.9W 35–3 vs Illinois St
2025-09-0627.4W 24–13 vs Michigan
2025-09-1337.5W 42–3 at Temple
2025-09-2069.1W 24–17 vs Auburn
2025-09-2759.4No game
2025-10-0434.9W 44–0 vs Kent State
2025-10-1163L 6–23 vs Texas
2025-10-1866.2W 26–7 at South Carolina
2025-10-2571.7L 26–34 vs Ole Miss
2025-11-0163.4W 33–27 at Tennessee
2025-11-0846.4No game
2025-11-1539.3W 23–21 at Alabama
2025-11-2246.9W 17–6 vs Missouri
2025-11-2942.1W 17–13 vs LSU
2025-12-0631.3No game
2025-12-1319.8L 24–34 vs Alabama
2025-12-2090.9No game
2025-12-2753.4No game
2026-01-0337.7No game
2026-01-1042.4No game
2026-01-1736.6No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 90.9 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Dec 20)) against a season average of 51.3 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks3,083
  • Group Hate145
  • Sexual Content141
  • Harm Wish51
  • Violent Threat7
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender178
  • Disability119
  • Physical Appearance119
  • Age112
  • LGBTQIA+85
  • Race40
  • Religion5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Someone tel me best bbq in Norman !!! Coming from east coast to the Michigan game.

positiveFacebook

He as a person is just as awsome as his coaching.

positiveCoachingFacebook

I think it's going to be a tough night for the OL.

negativeFacebook

Congrats. But Tennessee has a horrible defense.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.