Notre Dame

Fighting Irish · 10–2 in 2025–26

Fan Score
546.2
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
70,866
2025–26 season
Positive share
54.6%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
41.6
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Notre Dame fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Team & Front Office: 18th percentile · Explicit Language: 25th percentile · Sports Betting: 25th percentilePercentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Notre Dame Harm: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame Identity-Based Abuse: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame Explicit Language: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame College Sports: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame Off-Field Storylines: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Notre Dame Team & Front Office: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive54.6%38,707
Neutral9.2%6,486
Negative34.5%24,452
Mixed1.7%1,221

Signature subtags

What Notre Dame fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
7.9×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 7.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

15 per 1,000 comments
Identity-Based Abuse
4.5×

Mentioned Religion at 4.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

0.9 per 1,000 comments
Off-Field Storylines
1.4×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 1.4× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

16.1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+60%+30%−30%−60%0%Peak: +57% · week of Aug 23Low: −25% · week of Dec 20Aug 31: L 24–27 at MiamiLSep 13: L 40–41 vs Texas A&MLSep 20: W 56–30 vs PurdueWSep 27: W 56–13 at ArkansasWOct 4: W 28–7 vs Boise StateWOct 11: W 36–7 vs NC StateWOct 18: W 34–24 vs USCWNov 1: W 25–10 at Boston CollegeWNov 8: W 49–10 vs NavyWNov 15: W 37–15 at PittsburghWNov 22: W 70–7 vs SyracuseWNov 29: W 49–20 at StanfordWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+57%31468432No game
2025-08-30−22%1,0521,7713,232L 24–27 at Miami
2025-09-06+4%145133327No game
2025-09-13−19%8081,2682,416L 40–41 vs Texas A&M
2025-09-20+17%1,4971,0042,844W 56–30 vs Purdue
2025-09-27+47%1,6025062,328W 56–13 at Arkansas
2025-10-04+35%2,1489063,503W 28–7 vs Boise State
2025-10-11+28%1,7088982,867W 36–7 vs NC State
2025-10-18+33%3,1391,4745,114W 34–24 vs USC
2025-10-25+51%543138794No game
2025-11-01+6%2,0231,7644,320W 25–10 at Boston College
2025-11-08+54%3,4538344,852W 49–10 vs Navy
2025-11-15+46%3,7721,1895,566W 37–15 at Pittsburgh
2025-11-22+44%3,4531,1945,190W 70–7 vs Syracuse
2025-11-29+29%2,8141,4054,824W 49–20 at Stanford
2025-12-06−10%4,9756,25412,458No game
2025-12-13+54%2,9327843,974No game
2025-12-20−25%7481,3172,290No game
2025-12-27−18%4656971,305No game
2026-01-03+37%24196392No game
2026-01-10+7%407344845No game
2026-01-17+6%468408993No game
Fan mood fell 79 points the week they lost by 3 at Miami.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%37%74%Aug 31: L 24–27 at MiamiLSep 13: L 40–41 vs Texas A&MLSep 20: W 56–30 vs PurdueWSep 27: W 56–13 at ArkansasWOct 4: W 28–7 vs Boise StateWOct 11: W 36–7 vs NC StateWOct 18: W 34–24 vs USCWNov 1: W 25–10 at Boston CollegeWNov 8: W 49–10 vs NavyWNov 15: W 37–15 at PittsburghWNov 22: W 70–7 vs SyracuseWNov 29: W 49–20 at StanfordWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2372.7%15.7%432
2025-08-3032.5%54.8%3,232
2025-09-0644.3%40.7%327
2025-09-1333.4%52.5%2,416
2025-09-2052.6%35.3%2,844
2025-09-2768.8%21.7%2,328
2025-10-0461.3%25.9%3,503
2025-10-1159.6%31.3%2,867
2025-10-1861.4%28.8%5,114
2025-10-2568.4%17.4%794
2025-11-0146.8%40.8%4,320
2025-11-0871.2%17.2%4,852
2025-11-1567.8%21.4%5,566
2025-11-2266.5%23%5,190
2025-11-2958.3%29.1%4,824
2025-12-0639.9%50.2%12,458
2025-12-1373.8%19.7%3,974
2025-12-2032.7%57.5%2,290
2025-12-2735.6%53.4%1,305
2026-01-0361.5%24.5%392
2026-01-1048.2%40.7%845
2026-01-1747.1%41.1%993

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm35.8 per 1,000 · 2,534
Group Hate 75Harm Wish 27Personal Attacks 2,417Sexual Content 50Violent Threat 5
Identity-Based Abuse5.8 per 1,000 · 414
Disability 49Age 47Gender 112LGBTQIA+ 23Physical Appearance 110Race 18Religion 67
Explicit Language10.5 per 1,000 · 743
Explicit Acronym 482Explicit Emoji 52Explicit Words 193Usual Suspects 3Violent Language 22
College Sports21.5 per 1,000 · 1,524
Band 45Conference Realignment 1,064NIL 108Recruiting 148Student Section 19Transfer Portal 158
Off-Field Storylines33.7 per 1,000 · 2,390
Broadcast & Media 1,140Injuries 380Officiating 826Player Conduct 10Politics & Activism 43
Sports Betting2.4 per 1,000 · 173
Gambling 137Moneyline 9Parlay 7Prop Bet 20
Team & Front Office89.9 per 1,000 · 6,373
Coaching 4,131Crowd & Attendance 248Front Office 128Opponent Hostility 1,368Opponent Respect 354Athletic Department 5Stadium Experience 207

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

25th percentile
743 explicit comments10.5 per 1,000
  • Explicit Acronym482
  • Explicit Words193
  • Explicit Emoji52
  • Violent Language22
  • Usual Suspects3

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 10.5 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 77th of 100 nationally, the 25th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 41.6117.2 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 10)LLWWWWWWWWWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-239.3No game
2025-08-3031.3L 24–27 at Miami
2025-09-0679.5No game
2025-09-1330.2L 40–41 vs Texas A&M
2025-09-2038W 56–30 vs Purdue
2025-09-2730.5W 56–13 at Arkansas
2025-10-0427.7W 28–7 vs Boise State
2025-10-1128.3W 36–7 vs NC State
2025-10-1824.6W 34–24 vs USC
2025-10-2521.4No game
2025-11-0125.9W 25–10 at Boston College
2025-11-0835.9W 49–10 vs Navy
2025-11-1519.8W 37–15 at Pittsburgh
2025-11-2237W 70–7 vs Syracuse
2025-11-2926.9W 49–20 at Stanford
2025-12-0674.1No game
2025-12-1329.7No game
2025-12-2064.6No game
2025-12-2795No game
2026-01-0353.6No game
2026-01-10117.2No game
2026-01-1793.7No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 117.2 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 10)) against a season average of 41.6 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks2,417
  • Group Hate75
  • Sexual Content50
  • Harm Wish27
  • Violent Threat5
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender112
  • Physical Appearance110
  • Religion67
  • Disability49
  • Age47
  • LGBTQIA+23
  • Race18

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

They are not changing it, are they??? We're traditionalists!

positiveFacebook

Show'em who's boss! 🍀🍀 Irish!

positiveFacebook

They’re gonna try to play when our athletes are asleep

negativeFacebook

Another great back that can’t get enough playing time.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.