Sam Houston

Bearkats · 2–10 in 2025–26

Fan Score
592.7
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
2,438
2025–26 season
Positive share
59.3%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
11.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Sam Houston fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 98th percentile · College Sports: 93rd percentile · Explicit Language: 27th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Harm, Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Sam Houston Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Explicit Language: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston College Sports: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Off-Field Storylines: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Team & Front Office: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive59.3%1,445
Neutral12.5%304
Negative26.6%648
Mixed1.7%41

Signature subtags

What Sam Houston fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Off-Field Storylines
4.1×

Mentioned Broadcast & Media at 4.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

48.4 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
3.3×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 3.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.2 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
3×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

14.8 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 20Low: −15% · L 10–37 at New Mexico StateAug 23: L 24–41 at WKULAug 29: L 21–38 vs UNLVLSep 6: L 20–37 at HawaiiLSep 20: L 0–55 at TexasLOct 2: L 10–37 at New Mexico StateLOct 9: L 27–29 vs Jacksonville StateLOct 15: L 17–35 vs UTEPLOct 31: L 14–55 at Louisiana TechLNov 8: W 21–17 at Oregon StateWNov 15: W 26–23 vs DelawareWNov 22: L 17–31 at Middle TennesseeLNov 29: L 16–56 vs FIULAug 23Jan 10
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+34%8234142L 24–41 at WKU; L 21–38 vs UNLV
2025-08-30+25%7943142No game
2025-09-06+42%8326136L 20–37 at Hawaii
2025-09-13+46%461568No game
2025-09-20+14%12990285L 0–55 at Texas
2025-09-27−15%4157110L 10–37 at New Mexico State
2025-10-04+3%10799253L 27–29 vs Jacksonville State
2025-10-11−6%6473161L 17–35 vs UTEP
2025-10-18+32%13622No game
2025-10-25+49%551777L 14–55 at Louisiana Tech
2025-11-01−14%73100194No game
2025-11-08+78%20115237W 21–17 at Oregon State
2025-11-15+80%1267149W 26–23 vs Delaware
2025-11-22+41%592193L 17–31 at Middle Tennessee
2025-11-29+58%20143274L 16–56 vs FIU
2025-12-06+93%14015No game
2025-12-13+33%103No game
2025-12-20+100%101No game
2025-12-27+20%215No game
2026-01-03No comments000No game
2026-01-10+94%68171No game
Mood climbed for 2 straight weeks after the week of Nov 1, gaining 94 points.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 23: L 24–41 at WKULAug 29: L 21–38 vs UNLVLSep 6: L 20–37 at HawaiiLSep 20: L 0–55 at TexasLOct 2: L 10–37 at New Mexico StateLOct 9: L 27–29 vs Jacksonville StateLOct 15: L 17–35 vs UTEPLOct 31: L 14–55 at Louisiana TechLNov 8: W 21–17 at Oregon StateWNov 15: W 26–23 vs DelawareWNov 22: L 17–31 at Middle TennesseeLNov 29: L 16–56 vs FIULAug 23Jan 10
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2357.7%23.9%142
2025-08-3055.6%30.3%142
2025-09-0661%19.1%136
2025-09-1367.6%22.1%68
2025-09-2045.3%31.6%285
2025-09-2737.3%51.8%110
2025-10-0442.3%39.1%253
2025-10-1139.8%45.3%161
2025-10-1859.1%27.3%22
2025-10-2571.4%22.1%77
2025-11-0137.6%51.5%194
2025-11-0884.8%6.3%237
2025-11-1584.6%4.7%149
2025-11-2263.4%22.6%93
2025-11-2973.4%15.7%274
2025-12-0693.3%0%15
2025-12-1333.3%0%3
2025-12-20100%0%1
2025-12-2740%20%5
2026-01-030%0%0
2026-01-1095.8%1.4%71

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm9.4 per 1,000 · 23
Personal Attacks 22Group Hate 1
Identity-Based Abuse1.6 per 1,000 · 4
Disability 2LGBTQIA+ 1Gender 1
Explicit Language10.7 per 1,000 · 26
Explicit Acronym 1Explicit Words 23Explicit Emoji 1Violent Language 1
College Sports34.5 per 1,000 · 84
Recruiting 26NIL 21Band 5Transfer Portal 23Conference Realignment 15Student Section 1
Off-Field Storylines54.6 per 1,000 · 133
Broadcast & Media 118Officiating 9Injuries 6
Sports Betting4.1 per 1,000 · 10
Gambling 6Prop Bet 2Parlay 1Moneyline 1
Team & Front Office135.4 per 1,000 · 330
Opponent Respect 9Coaching 237Crowd & Attendance 34Opponent Hostility 18Stadium Experience 36Front Office 15Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

27th percentile
26 explicit comments10.7 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words23
  • Explicit Acronym1
  • Explicit Emoji1
  • Violent Language1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 10.7 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 75th of 100 nationally, the 27th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 11.143.5 per 1,000 · L 17–35 vs UTEPLLLLLLLLWWLL2025-08-232026-01-10
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230L 24–41 at WKU; L 21–38 vs UNLV
2025-08-307No game
2025-09-0622.1L 20–37 at Hawaii
2025-09-1314.7No game
2025-09-203.5L 0–55 at Texas
2025-09-270L 10–37 at New Mexico State
2025-10-0411.9L 27–29 vs Jacksonville State
2025-10-1143.5L 17–35 vs UTEP
2025-10-180No game
2025-10-2539L 14–55 at Louisiana Tech
2025-11-0130.9No game
2025-11-088.4W 21–17 at Oregon State
2025-11-150W 26–23 vs Delaware
2025-11-220L 17–31 at Middle Tennessee
2025-11-290L 16–56 vs FIU
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 43.5 per 1,000 comments (L 17–35 vs UTEP) against a season average of 11.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks22
  • Group Hate1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability2
  • Gender1
  • LGBTQIA+1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

𝙄𝙏'𝙎 𝙂𝘼𝙈𝙀𝘿𝘼𝙔 Game will be broadcast live on here Here's the link for the stream https://tinyurl.bobokotv.com/football.php

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Very deserving lady with long time ties to Sam Houston.

positiveFacebook

3 and out then Gamecocks just blew right past this horrible defense on the first drive !

negativeFacebook

Hate the loss on a walk-off field goal, but the Kats played a great game tonight!

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.