Georgia Southern

Eagles · 7–6 in 2025–26

Compare Georgia Southern with…
Fan Score
679.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,449
2025–26 season
Positive share
67.9%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
18.9
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Georgia Southern fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile · Harm: 26th percentile · College Sports: 36th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Southern Harm: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Explicit Language: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern College Sports: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Team & Front Office: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive67.9%3,022
Neutral9.6%425
Negative21.1%937
Mixed1.5%65

Signature subtags

What Georgia Southern fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
2.8×

Mentioned Band at 2.8× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

3.6 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.5×

Mentioned Stadium Experience at 1.5× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

7.4 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.1×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

95.3 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +81% · W 29–10 vs Appalachian StateLow: −19% · week of Oct 11Aug 30: L 14–42 at Fresno StateLSep 6: L 20–59 at USCLSep 13: W 41–34 vs Jacksonville StateWSep 20: W 45–17 vs MaineWSep 27: L 10–35 at James MadisonLOct 9: L 35–38 vs Southern MissLOct 18: W 41–24 vs Georgia StateWOct 25: L 24–34 at Arkansas StateLNov 6: W 25–23 at Appalachian StateWNov 15: W 45–40 vs Coastal CarolinaWNov 22: L 10–45 vs Old DominionLNov 29: W 24–19 at MarshallWDec 29: W 29–10 vs Appalachian StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+79%1015121No game
2025-08-30+40%18370283L 14–42 at Fresno State
2025-09-06+43%8129122L 20–59 at USC
2025-09-13+74%22223269W 41–34 vs Jacksonville State
2025-09-20+74%18323216W 45–17 vs Maine
2025-09-27+5%464196L 10–35 at James Madison
2025-10-04+4%7064164L 35–38 vs Southern Miss
2025-10-11−19%192953No game
2025-10-18+44%11739177W 41–24 vs Georgia State
2025-10-25+15%8864161L 24–34 at Arkansas State
2025-11-01+40%16062244W 25–23 at Appalachian State
2025-11-08+76%58570No game
2025-11-15+77%23417281W 45–40 vs Coastal Carolina
2025-11-22+6%138122286L 10–45 vs Old Dominion
2025-11-29+30%412195732W 24–19 at Marshall
2025-12-06+2%8985224No game
2025-12-13+75%74789No game
2025-12-20+78%53463No game
2025-12-27+81%66248758W 29–10 vs Appalachian State
2026-01-03+72%20225No game
2026-01-10+43%527No game
2026-01-17+75%718No game
Fan mood jumped 74 points the week of Dec 13.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%44%88%Aug 30: L 14–42 at Fresno StateLSep 6: L 20–59 at USCLSep 13: W 41–34 vs Jacksonville StateWSep 20: W 45–17 vs MaineWSep 27: L 10–35 at James MadisonLOct 9: L 35–38 vs Southern MissLOct 18: W 41–24 vs Georgia StateWOct 25: L 24–34 at Arkansas StateLNov 6: W 25–23 at Appalachian StateWNov 15: W 45–40 vs Coastal CarolinaWNov 22: L 10–45 vs Old DominionLNov 29: W 24–19 at MarshallWDec 29: W 29–10 vs Appalachian StateWAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2383.5%4.1%121
2025-08-3064.7%24.7%283
2025-09-0666.4%23.8%122
2025-09-1382.5%8.6%269
2025-09-2084.7%10.6%216
2025-09-2747.9%42.7%96
2025-10-0442.7%39%164
2025-10-1135.8%54.7%53
2025-10-1866.1%22%177
2025-10-2554.7%39.8%161
2025-11-0165.6%25.4%244
2025-11-0882.9%7.1%70
2025-11-1583.3%6%281
2025-11-2248.3%42.7%286
2025-11-2956.3%26.6%732
2025-12-0639.7%37.9%224
2025-12-1383.1%7.9%89
2025-12-2084.1%6.3%63
2025-12-2787.3%6.3%758
2026-01-0380%8%25
2026-01-1071.4%28.6%7
2026-01-1787.5%12.5%8

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm15.5 per 1,000 · 69
Personal Attacks 64Group Hate 2Harm Wish 3Violent Threat 1
Identity-Based Abuse3.4 per 1,000 · 15
Age 4Disability 5Physical Appearance 4Gender 2Race 1
Explicit Language14.8 per 1,000 · 66
Explicit Words 57Explicit Acronym 10
College Sports13.7 per 1,000 · 61
Recruiting 17Transfer Portal 16Band 16NIL 10Conference Realignment 3Student Section 2
Off-Field Storylines15.3 per 1,000 · 68
Broadcast & Media 49Officiating 3Injuries 16
Sports Betting0.7 per 1,000 · 3
Gambling 3
Team & Front Office122.7 per 1,000 · 546
Coaching 424Stadium Experience 33Opponent Hostility 36Front Office 14Crowd & Attendance 39Opponent Respect 9Athletic Department 2

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

40th percentile
66 explicit comments14.8 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words57
  • Explicit Acronym10

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 14.8 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 61st of 100 nationally, the 40th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 18.9285.7 per 1,000 · no game that week (week of Jan 10)LLWWLLWLWWLWW2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-238.3No game
2025-08-3010.6L 14–42 at Fresno State
2025-09-068.2L 20–59 at USC
2025-09-130W 41–34 vs Jacksonville State
2025-09-2050.9W 45–17 vs Maine
2025-09-2720.8L 10–35 at James Madison
2025-10-046.1L 35–38 vs Southern Miss
2025-10-1156.6No game
2025-10-1811.3W 41–24 vs Georgia State
2025-10-2524.8L 24–34 at Arkansas State
2025-11-0128.7W 25–23 at Appalachian State
2025-11-080No game
2025-11-157.1W 45–40 vs Coastal Carolina
2025-11-2249L 10–45 vs Old Dominion
2025-11-2920.5W 24–19 at Marshall
2025-12-0626.8No game
2025-12-1322.5No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-279.2W 29–10 vs Appalachian State
2026-01-0340No game
2026-01-10285.7No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 285.7 per 1,000 comments (no game that week (week of Jan 10)) against a season average of 18.9 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks64
  • Harm Wish3
  • Group Hate2
  • Violent Threat1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability5
  • Age4
  • Physical Appearance4
  • Gender2
  • Race1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

#HailSouthern! Hell yeah!🦅💙🦅

positiveFacebook

Congrats, Andre! You’ll be awesome!

positiveFacebook

Almost choked. That 25 to 9 lead went away in a hurry. Better play 4 quarters and stop trying to play the clock.

negativeFacebook

Game ball over app … just a hard to watch at the end until southern finally got the ball at the end …

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.