UL Monroe

Warhawks · 3–9 in 2025–26

Fan Score
741.3
positive per 1,000 comments
Low volume, not ranked
Comments analyzed
943
2025–26 season
Positive share
74.1%
of all fan comments
Low volume, not ranked
Toxicity
11.7
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Low volume, not ranked
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UL Monroe fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Comment volume too low to rank tag groups.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UL Monroe Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

Sentiment

Positive74.1%699
Neutral11.8%111
Negative12.3%116
Mixed1.8%17
Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +100% · week of Dec 6Low: −100% · week of Jan 17Aug 28: W 29–0 vs Saint FrancisWSep 6: L 0–73 at AlabamaLSep 20: W 31–25 at UTEPWSep 27: W 28–16 vs Arkansas StateWOct 4: L 7–42 at NorthwesternLOct 11: L 8–23 at Coastal CarolinaLOct 18: L 14–37 vs TroyLOct 25: L 21–49 at Southern MissLNov 1: L 6–31 vs Old DominionLNov 15: L 14–26 vs South AlabamaLNov 22: L 14–31 at Texas StateLNov 29: L 27–30 (OT) at LouisianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+73%73495W 29–0 vs Saint Francis
2025-08-30+72%62579No game
2025-09-06+76%63675L 0–73 at Alabama
2025-09-13+73%9111No game
2025-09-20+78%1458176W 31–25 at UTEP
2025-09-27+83%1308147W 28–16 vs Arkansas State
2025-10-04+65%37746L 7–42 at Northwestern
2025-10-11+36%20542L 8–23 at Coastal Carolina
2025-10-18+24%12625L 14–37 vs Troy
2025-10-25+54%17424L 21–49 at Southern Miss
2025-11-01+12%282159L 6–31 vs Old Dominion
2025-11-08+67%203No game
2025-11-15−27%81526L 14–26 vs South Alabama
2025-11-22+11%221745L 14–31 at Texas State
2025-11-29+45%26742L 27–30 (OT) at Louisiana
2025-12-06+100%606No game
2025-12-13+100%10010No game
2025-12-20+100%10010No game
2025-12-27+100%10010No game
2026-01-03+67%516No game
2026-01-10+80%405No game
2026-01-17−100%011No game
Fan mood fell 180 points the week of Jan 17.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%50%100%Aug 28: W 29–0 vs Saint FrancisWSep 6: L 0–73 at AlabamaLSep 20: W 31–25 at UTEPWSep 27: W 28–16 vs Arkansas StateWOct 4: L 7–42 at NorthwesternLOct 11: L 8–23 at Coastal CarolinaLOct 18: L 14–37 vs TroyLOct 25: L 21–49 at Southern MissLNov 1: L 6–31 vs Old DominionLNov 15: L 14–26 vs South AlabamaLNov 22: L 14–31 at Texas StateLNov 29: L 27–30 (OT) at LouisianaLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2376.8%4.2%95
2025-08-3078.5%6.3%79
2025-09-0684%8%75
2025-09-1381.8%9.1%11
2025-09-2082.4%4.5%176
2025-09-2788.4%5.4%147
2025-10-0480.4%15.2%46
2025-10-1147.6%11.9%42
2025-10-1848%24%25
2025-10-2570.8%16.7%24
2025-11-0147.5%35.6%59
2025-11-0866.7%0%3
2025-11-1530.8%57.7%26
2025-11-2248.9%37.8%45
2025-11-2961.9%16.7%42
2025-12-06100%0%6
2025-12-13100%0%10
2025-12-20100%0%10
2025-12-27100%0%10
2026-01-0383.3%16.7%6
2026-01-1080%0%5
2026-01-170%100%1

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm9.5 per 1,000 · 9
Personal Attacks 9Sexual Content 1Harm Wish 1
Identity-Based Abuse2.1 per 1,000 · 2
Physical Appearance 1Age 1
Explicit Language5.3 per 1,000 · 5
Explicit Words 5
College Sports12.7 per 1,000 · 12
Transfer Portal 3Recruiting 6NIL 3Student Section 1Band 1
Off-Field Storylines11.7 per 1,000 · 11
Broadcast & Media 9Injuries 2
Sports Betting0 per 1,000 · 0
Team & Front Office83.8 per 1,000 · 79
Crowd & Attendance 29Coaching 29Stadium Experience 7Opponent Hostility 11Opponent Respect 2Front Office 3

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

Low volume

Too few comments to rank nationally.

5 explicit comments5.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 5.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page, too little volume here for a national rank.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 11.780 per 1,000 · L 14–37 vs TroyWLWWLLLLLLLL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230W 29–0 vs Saint Francis
2025-08-3012.7No game
2025-09-0613.3L 0–73 at Alabama
2025-09-130No game
2025-09-200W 31–25 at UTEP
2025-09-2713.6W 28–16 vs Arkansas State
2025-10-040L 7–42 at Northwestern
2025-10-110L 8–23 at Coastal Carolina
2025-10-1880L 14–37 vs Troy
2025-10-250L 21–49 at Southern Miss
2025-11-010L 6–31 vs Old Dominion
2025-11-080No game
2025-11-1576.9L 14–26 vs South Alabama
2025-11-2244.4L 14–31 at Texas State
2025-11-2923.8L 27–30 (OT) at Louisiana
2025-12-060No game
2025-12-130No game
2025-12-200No game
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-170No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 80 per 1,000 comments (L 14–37 vs Troy) against a season average of 11.7 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks9
  • Harm Wish1
  • Sexual Content1
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Age1
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Go Warhawks! Go ABQ trio #protectthetradition #7nictrujillofootball

positiveFacebook

These women play so fast and so hard…THEY DO NOT QUIT! They are SO MUCH FUN TO WATCH!!! I wish more people would come support them and cheer them on!

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Whoever comes up with these kickoff times wants ULM to tank in attendance.

negativeCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

I’ll take a win but damn.

mixedFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.