UConn

Huskies · 9–4 in 2025–26

Fan Score
585
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,323
2025–26 season
Positive share
58.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
20.6
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects UConn fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out College Sports: 100th percentile · Off-Field Storylines: 86th percentile · Team & Front Office: 30th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • UConn Harm: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UConn Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UConn Explicit Language: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UConn College Sports: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UConn Off-Field Storylines: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UConn Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UConn Team & Front Office: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive58.5%2,529
Neutral9%390
Negative30.1%1,303
Mixed2.3%101

Signature subtags

What UConn fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

College Sports
10.1×

Mentioned Conference Realignment at 10.1× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

19.2 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
4.6×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 4.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

17.3 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
4.3×

Mentioned Band at 4.3× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

5.6 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+90%+45%−45%−90%0%Peak: +85% · week of Jan 17Low: −33% · L 41–44 (OT) at DelawareAug 30: W 59–13 vs C ConnecticutWSep 6: L 20–27 (OT) at SyracuseLSep 13: L 41–44 (OT) at DelawareLSep 20: W 31–25 vs Ball StateWSep 27: W 20–17 at BuffaloWOct 4: W 51–10 vs FIUWOct 18: W 38–23 at Boston CollegeWOct 25: L 34–37 (2OT) at RiceLNov 1: W 38–19 vs UABWNov 8: W 37–34 vs DukeWNov 15: W 26–16 vs Air ForceWNov 22: W 48–45 at Florida AtlanticWDec 27: L 16–41 vs ArmyLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+40%13325No game
2025-08-30+45%15344242W 59–13 vs C Connecticut
2025-09-06−14%93128253L 20–27 (OT) at Syracuse
2025-09-13−33%65148248L 41–44 (OT) at Delaware
2025-09-20+25%6032112W 31–25 vs Ball State
2025-09-27+61%611182W 20–17 at Buffalo
2025-10-04+67%9016111W 51–10 vs FIU
2025-10-11+62%10213No game
2025-10-18+45%17059246W 38–23 at Boston College
2025-10-25−23%4985156L 34–37 (2OT) at Rice
2025-11-01+60%10721143W 38–19 vs UAB
2025-11-08+70%46363569W 37–34 vs Duke
2025-11-15+73%24728301W 26–16 vs Air Force
2025-11-22+36%22496359W 48–45 at Florida Atlantic
2025-11-29+29%381965No game
2025-12-06+28%12361222No game
2025-12-13+52%14940208No game
2025-12-20+54%7818111No game
2025-12-27−28%214416714L 16–41 vs Army
2026-01-03+72%71986No game
2026-01-10+60%415No game
2026-01-17+85%47352No game
Fan mood jumped 100 points the week of Jan 3.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%45%90%Aug 30: W 59–13 vs C ConnecticutWSep 6: L 20–27 (OT) at SyracuseLSep 13: L 41–44 (OT) at DelawareLSep 20: W 31–25 vs Ball StateWSep 27: W 20–17 at BuffaloWOct 4: W 51–10 vs FIUWOct 18: W 38–23 at Boston CollegeWOct 25: L 34–37 (2OT) at RiceLNov 1: W 38–19 vs UABWNov 8: W 37–34 vs DukeWNov 15: W 26–16 vs Air ForceWNov 22: W 48–45 at Florida AtlanticWDec 27: L 16–41 vs ArmyLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2352%12%25
2025-08-3063.2%18.2%242
2025-09-0636.8%50.6%253
2025-09-1326.2%59.7%248
2025-09-2053.6%28.6%112
2025-09-2774.4%13.4%82
2025-10-0481.1%14.4%111
2025-10-1176.9%15.4%13
2025-10-1869.1%24%246
2025-10-2531.4%54.5%156
2025-11-0174.8%14.7%143
2025-11-0881.4%11.1%569
2025-11-1582.1%9.3%301
2025-11-2262.4%26.7%359
2025-11-2958.5%29.2%65
2025-12-0655.4%27.5%222
2025-12-1371.6%19.2%208
2025-12-2070.3%16.2%111
2025-12-2730%58.3%714
2026-01-0382.6%10.5%86
2026-01-1080%20%5
2026-01-1790.4%5.8%52

Season timeline

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm18.5 per 1,000 · 80
Personal Attacks 74Group Hate 3Harm Wish 3
Identity-Based Abuse2.1 per 1,000 · 9
Gender 4Age 3Disability 1Physical Appearance 1
Explicit Language22 per 1,000 · 95
Explicit Acronym 19Explicit Words 80
College Sports52.7 per 1,000 · 228
NIL 42Conference Realignment 83Transfer Portal 75Band 24Student Section 4Recruiting 18
Off-Field Storylines39.1 per 1,000 · 169
Broadcast & Media 105Politics & Activism 1Injuries 42Officiating 15Player Conduct 9
Sports Betting4.2 per 1,000 · 18
Parlay 2Prop Bet 2Gambling 14
Team & Front Office105.3 per 1,000 · 455
Coaching 286Opponent Hostility 52Crowd & Attendance 75Stadium Experience 29Opponent Respect 10Front Office 11Athletic Department 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

52nd percentile
95 explicit comments22 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words80
  • Explicit Acronym19

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 22 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 49th of 100 nationally, the 52nd percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 20.643.4 per 1,000 · L 16–41 vs ArmyWLLWWWWLWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-230No game
2025-08-3020.7W 59–13 vs C Connecticut
2025-09-0619.8L 20–27 (OT) at Syracuse
2025-09-1332.3L 41–44 (OT) at Delaware
2025-09-200W 31–25 vs Ball State
2025-09-270W 20–17 at Buffalo
2025-10-049W 51–10 vs FIU
2025-10-110No game
2025-10-1816.3W 38–23 at Boston College
2025-10-256.4L 34–37 (2OT) at Rice
2025-11-0128W 38–19 vs UAB
2025-11-0815.8W 37–34 vs Duke
2025-11-156.6W 26–16 vs Air Force
2025-11-2219.5W 48–45 at Florida Atlantic
2025-11-290No game
2025-12-0613.5No game
2025-12-1328.8No game
2025-12-2018No game
2025-12-2743.4L 16–41 vs Army
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-100No game
2026-01-1719.2No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 43.4 per 1,000 comments (L 16–41 vs Army) against a season average of 20.6 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks74
  • Group Hate3
  • Harm Wish3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Gender4
  • Age3
  • Disability1
  • Physical Appearance1

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

Should be another exciting year for UConn Football

positiveFacebook

Congrats,Brock! Best wishes on this opportunity! Go, UConn!

positiveFacebook

I don’t think the helicopter that was circling all day got the message.

negativeFacebook

I love that we won, great win, but why are the students on the field when we beat an unranked team at home🤷

mixedStudent SectionFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.