Toledo

Rockets · 8–5 in 2025–26

Fan Score
655.2
positive per 1,000 comments
Comments analyzed
4,072
2025–26 season
Positive share
65.5%
of all fan comments
Toxicity
23.1
harm + identity abuse per 1,000 · lower is better
Part one

Who they are

The shape of one comment section: the mix of what gets talked about, how it splits by sentiment, and the subjects Toledo fans raise more than anyone else.

Comment-section fingerprint

Stands out Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile · Team & Front Office: 86th percentile · Explicit Language: 29th percentileLow volume (not ranked), omitted from the shape: Identity-Based Abuse, Sports Betting.Percentile of ranked FBS teams per tag group; low-volume fanbases excluded from each cohort.
  • Toledo Harm: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Toledo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Toledo Explicit Language: 29th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Toledo College Sports: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Toledo Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Toledo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Toledo Team & Front Office: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams

Sentiment

Positive65.5%2,668
Neutral7.2%295
Negative25.9%1,056
Mixed1.3%53

Signature subtags

What Toledo fans bring up more than anyone, vs all 138 FBS fanbases.

Team & Front Office
1.9×

Mentioned Crowd & Attendance at 1.9× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

18.2 per 1,000 comments
Team & Front Office
1.7×

Mentioned Coaching at 1.7× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

150.8 per 1,000 comments
College Sports
1.6×

Mentioned Transfer Portal at 1.6× the rate of the average classified fanbase.

6.1 per 1,000 comments

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

Part two

How the season felt

Week by week, with every game marked. The comment section keeps its own scoreboard, and it does not always agree with the one on the field.

Season heartbeat

Net comment mood by week (green above the baseline, red below) with every game marked on it. Click a game for that week’s story.

+100%+50%−50%−100%0%Peak: +91% · W 60–0 vs Morgan StLow: −59% · L 23–28 at Bowling GreenAug 30: L 16–24 at KentuckyLSep 6: W 45–21 vs WKUWSep 13: W 60–0 vs Morgan StWSep 20: L 13–14 at Western MichiganLSep 27: W 45–3 vs AkronWOct 11: L 23–28 at Bowling GreenLOct 18: W 45–10 vs Kent StateWOct 25: L 7–28 at Washington StateLNov 5: W 42–3 vs Northern IllinoisWNov 12: W 24–3 at Miami (Ohio)WNov 22: W 38–9 vs Ball StateWNov 29: W 21–3 at Central MichiganWDec 23: L 22–27 vs LouisvilleLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly net fan mood with positive, negative, and total comment counts
Week ofNet moodPositiveNegativeCommentsGames
2025-08-23+69%11314143No game
2025-08-30−8%8096195L 16–24 at Kentucky
2025-09-06+85%1024115W 45–21 vs WKU
2025-09-13+91%86292W 60–0 vs Morgan St
2025-09-20−44%39104148L 13–14 at Western Michigan
2025-09-27+32%552691W 45–3 vs Akron
2025-10-04+30%532788No game
2025-10-11−59%51214276L 23–28 at Bowling Green
2025-10-18−8%6072145W 45–10 vs Kent State
2025-10-25−37%45105162L 7–28 at Washington State
2025-11-01+25%462681W 42–3 vs Northern Illinois
2025-11-08+39%14056215W 24–3 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-11-15+10%5746110No game
2025-11-22+72%15121181W 38–9 vs Ball State
2025-11-29+55%25262345W 21–3 at Central Michigan
2025-12-06+56%43098591No game
2025-12-13+84%23613267No game
2025-12-20+77%26623314L 22–27 vs Louisville
2025-12-27+71%17221No game
2026-01-03+71%11615143No game
2026-01-10+59%8915126No game
2026-01-17+76%18415223No game
Fan mood fell 135 points the week they lost by 1 at Western Michigan.

Season trend

Weekly share of positive and negative comments with every game marked: click a dot for that week's story.

PositiveNegative
0%47%94%Aug 30: L 16–24 at KentuckyLSep 6: W 45–21 vs WKUWSep 13: W 60–0 vs Morgan StWSep 20: L 13–14 at Western MichiganLSep 27: W 45–3 vs AkronWOct 11: L 23–28 at Bowling GreenLOct 18: W 45–10 vs Kent StateWOct 25: L 7–28 at Washington StateLNov 5: W 42–3 vs Northern IllinoisWNov 12: W 24–3 at Miami (Ohio)WNov 22: W 38–9 vs Ball StateWNov 29: W 21–3 at Central MichiganWDec 23: L 22–27 vs LouisvilleLAug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: Positive, Negative
Week ofPositiveNegativeComments
2025-08-2379%9.8%143
2025-08-3041%49.2%195
2025-09-0688.7%3.5%115
2025-09-1393.5%2.2%92
2025-09-2026.4%70.3%148
2025-09-2760.4%28.6%91
2025-10-0460.2%30.7%88
2025-10-1118.5%77.5%276
2025-10-1841.4%49.7%145
2025-10-2527.8%64.8%162
2025-11-0156.8%32.1%81
2025-11-0865.1%26%215
2025-11-1551.8%41.8%110
2025-11-2283.4%11.6%181
2025-11-2973%18%345
2025-12-0672.8%16.6%591
2025-12-1388.4%4.9%267
2025-12-2084.7%7.3%314
2025-12-2781%9.5%21
2026-01-0381.1%10.5%143
2026-01-1070.6%11.9%126
2026-01-1782.5%6.7%223

Season timeline

Won the game, lost the comments once this season; open a game below for that night’s story.

Part three

What they actually said

The language, the moderation load, and the comments themselves, exactly as they were posted.

Comment insights

Classified comments per 1,000, by system-tag group.

Harm19.2 per 1,000 · 78
Personal Attacks 77Harm Wish 3
Identity-Based Abuse3.9 per 1,000 · 16
Physical Appearance 4Disability 5Gender 5Age 2
Explicit Language11.3 per 1,000 · 46
Explicit Words 41Explicit Acronym 5
College Sports17.2 per 1,000 · 70
Transfer Portal 25NIL 5Student Section 2Recruiting 27Band 6Conference Realignment 5
Off-Field Storylines14.5 per 1,000 · 59
Injuries 11Broadcast & Media 33Officiating 15
Sports Betting2 per 1,000 · 8
Gambling 8
Team & Front Office181 per 1,000 · 737
Coaching 614Crowd & Attendance 74Opponent Hostility 35Stadium Experience 21Athletic Department 2Front Office 10Opponent Respect 1

Subtag counts are tag applications, which may overlap.

The Swear Jar

29th percentile
46 explicit comments11.3 per 1,000
  • Explicit Words41
  • Explicit Acronym5

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Explicit language shows up in 11.3 of every 1,000 comments on this page: 72nd of 100 nationally, the 29th percentile.

Moderation snapshot

Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments · by week
season avg 23.180.2 per 1,000 · L 7–28 at Washington StateLWWLWLWLWWWWL2025-08-232026-01-17
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 comments, by week
Week ofRate per 1,000Games
2025-08-2314No game
2025-08-3061.5L 16–24 at Kentucky
2025-09-060W 45–21 vs WKU
2025-09-130W 60–0 vs Morgan St
2025-09-2060.8L 13–14 at Western Michigan
2025-09-2733W 45–3 vs Akron
2025-10-040No game
2025-10-1150.7L 23–28 at Bowling Green
2025-10-1855.2W 45–10 vs Kent State
2025-10-2580.2L 7–28 at Washington State
2025-11-0137W 42–3 vs Northern Illinois
2025-11-0832.6W 24–3 at Miami (Ohio)
2025-11-1536.4No game
2025-11-225.5W 38–9 vs Ball State
2025-11-2917.4W 21–3 at Central Michigan
2025-12-0615.2No game
2025-12-133.7No game
2025-12-200L 22–27 vs Louisville
2025-12-270No game
2026-01-030No game
2026-01-107.9No game
2026-01-174.5No game
Harm and identity-based abuse peaked at 80.2 per 1,000 comments (L 7–28 at Washington State) against a season average of 23.1 per 1,000.

Season subtag split

Season totals of the classifications Sence applied to comments on this page.

Harm
  • Personal Attacks77
  • Harm Wish3
Identity-Based Abuse
  • Disability5
  • Gender5
  • Physical Appearance4
  • Age2

Tag applications, which may overlap.

Sence flags these in real time so page owners can act before fans see them.

From the comment section

🏈🚀 #GoRockets Lets go get it!

positiveFacebook

While I absolutely LOVED the rivalry back in the late 90's early 2000's, I couldn't even tell you what conference Marshall is in today nor did I know if they even played football anymore.

positiveFacebook

They already did that three times this year

negativeFacebook

Kehres as HC. Good luck to coach Candle on his next job.

mixedCoachingFacebook
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.