2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence

Physical appearance abuse across Big Ten fanbases

Physical Appearance tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.

Compare two teams What is Sence?

This board is published without a winner on purpose. No fanbase is named a leader on any single axis of abuse, so the figures below are listed alphabetically rather than ranked. Only the combined harm and identity-based abuse figure is ranked, on the toxicity leaderboard.

All SEC Big Ten ACC Big 12 American C-USA MAC Mountain West Pac-12 Sun Belt Independent FCS

Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuse Race Gender LGBTQIA+Age Disability Physical Appearance

Team

Comments

Physical Appearance / 1k

–

Illinois

Fighting Illini · Big Ten · 9–4

Hoosiers · Big Ten · 16–0

Hawkeyes · Big Ten · 9–4

Terrapins · Big Ten · 4–8

9,607

–

Michigan

Wolverines · Big Ten · 9–4

133,763

–

Michigan State

Spartans · Big Ten · 4–8

20,528

–

Minnesota

Golden Gophers · Big Ten · 8–5

Cornhuskers · Big Ten · 7–6

Buckeyes · Big Ten · 12–2

Ducks · Big Ten · 13–2

Nittany Lions · Big Ten · 7–6

Bruins · Big Ten · 3–9

Trojans · Big Ten · 9–4

Huskies · Big Ten · 9–4

8,090

–

Wisconsin

Badgers · Big Ten · 4–8

48,811

Below volume threshold: too few comments to rate on Identity-based abuse: Physical Appearance per 1,000

–

Purdue

Boilermakers · Big Ten · 2–10

Scarlet Knights · Big Ten · 5–7

Wildcats · Big Ten · 7–6

1,838

1.6

Identity-based abuse: Physical Appearance per 1,000 is published for 15 of 18 Big Ten fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.