2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence
Physical appearance abuse across ACC fanbases
Physical Appearance tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.
Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuseRaceGenderLGBTQIA+AgeDisabilityPhysical Appearance
Rank
Team
Comments
Physical Appearance / 1k
1
North Carolina
Tar Heels · ACC · 4–8
8,668
5.2
2
Virginia Tech
Hokies · ACC · 3–9
16,922
3.4
3
Miami
Hurricanes · ACC · 13–3
61,113
2.6
4
Florida State
Seminoles · ACC · 5–7
20,908
1.9
5
Clemson
Tigers · ACC · 7–6
38,829
1.7
6
Pittsburgh
Panthers · ACC · 8–5
26,366
1.7
7
Syracuse
Orange · ACC · 3–9
9,364
1.7
8
Louisville
Cardinals · ACC · 9–4
12,501
1.6
9
Georgia Tech
Yellow Jackets · ACC · 9–4
35,814
1.1
Below volume threshold: too few comments to rank on Identity-based abuse: Physical Appearance per 1,000
–
Duke
Blue Devils · ACC · 9–5
14,337
0.5
–
Virginia
Cavaliers · ACC · 11–3
14,086
0.6
–
SMU
Mustangs · ACC · 9–4
7,390
0.8
–
NC State
Wolfpack · ACC · 8–5
4,850
1.4
–
Wake Forest
Demon Deacons · ACC · 9–4
4,755
0.2
–
Stanford
Cardinal · ACC · 4–8
3,877
1
–
Boston College
Eagles · ACC · 2–10
3,381
0.3
–
California
Golden Bears · ACC · 7–6
534
0
Identity-based abuse: Physical Appearance per 1,000 ranks 9 of 17 ACC fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.