2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence
Disability-based abuse across Big Ten fanbases
Disability tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.
Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuseRaceGenderLGBTQIA+AgeDisabilityPhysical Appearance
Rank
Team
Comments
Disability / 1k
1
Ohio State
Buckeyes · Big Ten · 12–2
108,740
2.8
2
Oregon
Ducks · Big Ten · 13–2
33,527
2.8
3
Michigan
Wolverines · Big Ten · 9–4
133,763
2.7
4
Nebraska
Cornhuskers · Big Ten · 7–6
47,727
2.2
5
Michigan State
Spartans · Big Ten · 4–8
20,528
2.1
6
Wisconsin
Badgers · Big Ten · 4–8
48,811
1.9
7
Minnesota
Golden Gophers · Big Ten · 8–5
16,116
1.8
8
Penn State
Nittany Lions · Big Ten · 7–6
57,708
1.5
9
UCLA
Bruins · Big Ten · 3–9
20,831
1.2
10
USC
Trojans · Big Ten · 9–4
40,287
1.2
11
Illinois
Fighting Illini · Big Ten · 9–4
15,179
1
12
Iowa
Hawkeyes · Big Ten · 9–4
22,273
0.9
13
Indiana
Hoosiers · Big Ten · 16–0
42,201
0.8
Below volume threshold: too few comments to rank on Identity-based abuse: Disability per 1,000
–
Maryland
Terrapins · Big Ten · 4–8
9,607
1.4
–
Washington
Huskies · Big Ten · 9–4
8,090
1.1
–
Purdue
Boilermakers · Big Ten · 2–10
6,141
1.1
–
Rutgers
Scarlet Knights · Big Ten · 5–7
5,649
1.1
–
Northwestern
Wildcats · Big Ten · 7–6
1,838
0
Identity-based abuse: Disability per 1,000 ranks 13 of 18 Big Ten fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.