2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence
Disability-based abuse across Big 12 fanbases
Disability tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.
Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuseRaceGenderLGBTQIA+AgeDisabilityPhysical Appearance
Rank
Team
Comments
Disability / 1k
1
Oklahoma State
Cowboys · Big 12 · 1–11
25,460
2.4
2
Utah
Utes · Big 12 · 11–2
16,435
1.7
3
Houston
Cougars · Big 12 · 10–3
17,558
1.6
4
Arizona State
Sun Devils · Big 12 · 8–5
13,057
1.5
5
Arizona
Wildcats · Big 12 · 9–4
13,960
1.4
6
West Virginia
Mountaineers · Big 12 · 4–8
31,415
1.4
7
BYU
Cougars · Big 12 · 12–2
32,975
1.2
8
Iowa State
Cyclones · Big 12 · 8–4
21,588
1.1
9
Kansas State
Wildcats · Big 12 · 6–6
17,428
1
10
Texas Tech
Red Raiders · Big 12 · 12–2
54,597
0.5
Below volume threshold: too few comments to rank on Identity-based abuse: Disability per 1,000
–
Colorado
Buffaloes · Big 12 · 3–9
13,180
0.1
–
Cincinnati
Bearcats · Big 12 · 7–6
12,753
0.9
–
TCU
Horned Frogs · Big 12 · 9–4
9,897
0
–
Baylor
Bears · Big 12 · 5–7
8,814
0.3
–
Kansas
Jayhawks · Big 12 · 5–7
8,065
1.7
–
UCF
Knights · Big 12 · 5–7
5,718
0.3
Identity-based abuse: Disability per 1,000 ranks 10 of 16 Big 12 fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.