← All conferences2025–26 dossier

Big 12

Every Big 12 comment section, classified the same way as the rest of the country: what the league argues about, who it argues with loudest, and how every member fanbase ranks.

Comments analyzed
302,900
2025–26 season
Positive share
58.9%
conference-wide
Happiest fanbase
TTU
723.4 Fan Score
Harm & abuse per 1,000
35
conference-wide
01Conference personality

What the Big 12 talks about.

Tag-group mentions per 1,000 comments, conference-wide. The black tick on every bar marks the FBS-wide rate.

Harm
28.6 · FBS 36.8
Identity-Based Abuse
6.5 · FBS 7.8
Explicit Language
17.2 · FBS 28.1
College Sports1.1× the national rate
17.7 · FBS 15.4
Off-Field Storylines
34.8 · FBS 31
Sports Betting
2.9 · FBS 3.2
Team & Front Office
129.4 · FBS 138.4

The Big 12 talks College Sports at 1.1× the national rate.

02Loudest rivalry

The pairing that drew the biggest crowd.

87,572 season comments across the two fanbases combined, the loudest pairing of any Big 12 matchup that was played.

03The members

16 comment sections, ranked by Fan Score.

Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Comments counts every comment classified this season, which is volume, not quality.

04Leaderboards

Every national board, Big 12 only.

The same rankings as the national leaderboards, narrowed to Big 12 fanbases and measured exactly the same way.

Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.