2025–26 season · all 138 FBS fanbases · classified by Sence

Gender-based abuse across Big 12 fanbases

Gender tag applications under Identity-Based Abuse per 1,000 comments for every FBS fanbase: a moderation snapshot, measured the same way as everything else on this site.

Compare two teams What is Sence?

This board is published without a winner on purpose. No fanbase is named a leader on any single axis of abuse, so the figures below are listed alphabetically rather than ranked. Only the combined harm and identity-based abuse figure is ranked, on the toxicity leaderboard.

All SEC Big Ten ACC Big 12 American C-USA MAC Mountain West Pac-12 Sun Belt Independent FCS

Identity-based abuse, tag by tagCombined harm & abuse Race Gender LGBTQIA+Age Disability Physical Appearance

Team

Comments

Gender / 1k

–

Arizona

Wildcats · Big 12 · 9–4

Sun Devils · Big 12 · 8–5

Cougars · Big 12 · 12–2

Bearcats · Big 12 · 7–6

Cougars · Big 12 · 10–3

Cyclones · Big 12 · 8–4

Jayhawks · Big 12 · 5–7

Wildcats · Big 12 · 6–6

17,428

–

Oklahoma State

Cowboys · Big 12 · 1–11

Red Raiders · Big 12 · 12–2

Mountaineers · Big 12 · 4–8

31,415

0.9

Below volume threshold: too few comments to rate on Identity-based abuse: Gender per 1,000

–

Colorado

Buffaloes · Big 12 · 3–9

Horned Frogs · Big 12 · 9–4

Knights · Big 12 · 5–7

5,718

0.9

Identity-based abuse: Gender per 1,000 is published for 12 of 16 Big 12 fanbases with enough classified comments to rate. Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Toxicity counts harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000; every other rate counts that tag group's comments per 1,000, using Sence's system-tag taxonomy.