← All conferences2025–26 dossier

MAC

Every MAC comment section, classified the same way as the rest of the country: what the league argues about, who it argues with loudest, and how every member fanbase ranks.

Comments analyzed
28,671
2025–26 season
Positive share
73.6%
conference-wide
Happiest fanbase
CMU
803.3 Fan Score
Harm & abuse per 1,000
14
conference-wide
01Conference personality

What the MAC talks about.

Tag-group mentions per 1,000 comments, conference-wide. The black tick on every bar marks the FBS-wide rate.

Harm
11 · FBS 36.8
Identity-Based Abuse
3 · FBS 7.8
Explicit Language
7.5 · FBS 28.1
College Sports1.1× the national rate
17.1 · FBS 15.4
Off-Field Storylines
19.4 · FBS 31
Sports Betting
3.2 · FBS 3.2
Team & Front Office
96.5 · FBS 138.4

The MAC talks College Sports at 1.1× the national rate.

02Loudest rivalry

The pairing that drew the biggest crowd.

10,421 season comments across the two fanbases combined, the loudest pairing of any MAC matchup that was played.

03The members

13 comment sections, ranked by Fan Score.

Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Comments counts every comment classified this season, which is volume, not quality.

04Leaderboards

Every national board, MAC only.

The same rankings as the national leaderboards, narrowed to MAC fanbases and measured exactly the same way.

Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.