Lost to Oklahoma 13–24

Compare the fanbases

Final · at Oklahoma · Sep 6

MICH 13OU 24

Comment section · week of Sep 6

28.6%

positive share · −18.6 pts vs season

Lost the game and the comments: the week ran net negative.

The comment week

How the week read

Every comment Sence classified on Michigan’s page that week, held against the fanbase’s own season baseline.

Comments that week

10,200

week of Sep 6

Positive share

28.6%

−18.6 pts vs season average

Negative share

63.1%

+20.9 pts vs season average

Explicit language

77.7

per 1,000 that week

Both sides of the final whistle

Compare the fanbases →

The same game week in each fanbase's comment section, measured against its own season average.

LMichigan

Positive share: 28.6%; −18.6 pts vs season average
Negative share: 63.1%; +20.9 pts vs season average

WOklahoma

Positive share: 67.8%; +15.3 pts vs season average
Negative share: 20.8%; −14.6 pts vs season average

The week's storylines

Classified comments per 1,000 that week, against the season average.

Harm68.3+5.8 vs season

Identity-Based Abuse14.7+0.8 vs season

Explicit Language77.7+25.5 vs season

College Sports19.9+5.3 vs season

Off-Field Storylines23.2−6 vs season

Sports Betting2−1.3 vs season

Team & Front Office280.3+116.2 vs season

The comment section reacts

“great for Cole .... great kid with a lot of upside ..... glad he chose a team that SUCKs again this year which affords Cole more playing time. Good luck Cole!”

mixedRecruitingFacebook

“Question: So, what's the difference between this hit and the one that was called targeting???? Answer: Nothing!!! Neither one was targeting!!!”

negativeOfficiatingFacebook

“Surprised they didn’t call targeting.”

negativeOfficiatingFacebook

← W vs New Mexico W vs Central Michigan →