← Cincinnati season
WWon the game and the comments: the week ran net positive.
CIN 34BGSU 20
Sep 6 · 3:30pm ET · Home · ESPN+Beat Bowling Green 34–20
Final · vs Bowling Green · Sep 6
CIN 34BGSU 20
WComment section · week of Sep 6
68.9%
positive share · +15.4 pts vs season
The comment week
How the week read
Every comment Sence classified on Cincinnati’s page that week, held against the fanbase’s own season baseline.
Comments that week
395
week of Sep 6
Positive share
68.9%
+15.4 pts vs season average
Negative share
23.3%
−9.7 pts vs season average
Explicit language
5.1
per 1,000 that week
Both sides of the final whistle
Compare the fanbases →The same game week in each fanbase's comment section, measured against its own season average.
- Positive share
- 68.9%
- +15.4 pts vs season average
- Negative share
- 23.3%
- −9.7 pts vs season average
- Positive share
- 64.4%
- −13.9 pts vs season average
- Negative share
- 4.3%
- −2.6 pts vs season average
The week's storylines
Classified comments per 1,000 that week, against the season average.
Harm12.7−20.9 vs season (stood out this week)
Identity-Based Abuse5.1−2 vs season
Explicit Language5.1−2.3 vs season (stood out this week)
College Sports12.7−4.9 vs season
Off-Field Storylines48.1+10.4 vs season
Sports Betting2.5+0.2 vs season
Team & Front Office93.7−33.1 vs season
The comment section reacts
“Fire satterfield! Until then we will be bottom of the big 12”
negativeCoachingFacebook
“Who cares what you look like if you can't win? How many more mediocre seasons until athletics admits how bad of a hiring Scotty was?”
negativeCoachingFacebook
“Here's the link for the streamed 🔴🎥 livescore.scorestream4k.com/ncaa-football.php”
neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook