← Stanford season
LLost the game and the comments: the week ran net negative.
STAN 20PITT 35
Nov 1 · 3:30pm ET · Home · ACC NetworkLost to Pittsburgh 20–35
Final · vs Pittsburgh · Nov 1
STAN 20PITT 35
LComment section · week of Nov 1
24.5%
positive share · −29.3 pts vs season
The comment week
How the week read
Every comment Sence classified on Stanford’s page that week, held against the fanbase’s own season baseline.
Comments that week
110
week of Nov 1
Positive share
24.5%
−29.3 pts vs season average
Negative share
60%
+27.1 pts vs season average
Explicit language
18.2
per 1,000 that week
Both sides of the final whistle
Compare the fanbases →The same game week in each fanbase's comment section, measured against its own season average.
- Positive share
- 24.5%
- −29.3 pts vs season average
- Negative share
- 60%
- +27.1 pts vs season average
- Positive share
- 65.1%
- +13.1 pts vs season average
- Negative share
- 18.7%
- −16.4 pts vs season average
The week's storylines
Classified comments per 1,000 that week, against the season average.
Harm27.3−0.8 vs season
Identity-Based Abuse0−6.2 vs season (stood out this week)
Explicit Language18.2−0.9 vs season
College Sports127.3+81.6 vs season (stood out this week)
Off-Field Storylines9.1−26.2 vs season (stood out this week)
Sports Betting0−6.7 vs season (stood out this week)
Team & Front Office254.5+82.5 vs season (stood out this week)
The comment section reacts
“Gulbranson is an INT machine!!! Pull him!”
positiveCoachingFacebook
“Gulbranson has already thrown two interceptions. Time to bring in Brown!”
negativeCoachingFacebook
“Brown should have been starting the whole season they playing a 5 the year senior in a rebuilding team .”
negativeCoachingFacebook