← All conferences2025–26 dossier
Pac-12
Every Pac-12 comment section, classified the same way as the rest of the country: what the league argues about, who it argues with loudest, and how every member fanbase ranks.
Comments analyzed
12,154
2025–26 season
Positive share
60.7%
conference-wide
Happiest fanbase
WSU
627.4 Fan Score
Harm & abuse per 1,000
34.5
conference-wide
01Conference personality
What the Pac-12 talks about.
Tag-group mentions per 1,000 comments, conference-wide. The black tick on every bar marks the FBS-wide rate.
Harm
29.5 · FBS 36.8
Identity-Based Abuse
5 · FBS 7.8
Explicit Language
24.7 · FBS 28.1
College Sports2.1× the national rate
31.6 · FBS 15.4
Off-Field Storylines
20.4 · FBS 31
Sports Betting
3.6 · FBS 3.2
Team & Front Office
165 · FBS 138.4
The Pac-12 talks College Sports at 2.1× the national rate.
02Loudest rivalry
The pairing that drew the biggest crowd.
12,154 season comments across the two fanbases combined, the loudest pairing of any Pac-12 matchup that was played.
03The members
2 comment sections, ranked by Fan Score.
Fan Score is positive comments per 1,000 analyzed. Comments counts every comment classified this season, which is volume, not quality.
04Leaderboards
Every national board, Pac-12 only.
The same rankings as the national leaderboards, narrowed to Pac-12 fanbases and measured exactly the same way.
Fan ScoreComment volumePositive shareNegative comments per 1,000Harm & identity-based abuse per 1,000Identity-based abuse: Race per 1,000Identity-based abuse: Gender per 1,000Identity-based abuse: LGBTQIA+ per 1,000Identity-based abuse: Age per 1,000Identity-based abuse: Disability per 1,000Identity-based abuse: Physical Appearance per 1,000Explicit language per 1,000Sports betting talk per 1,000Coaching talk per 1,000NIL & transfer portal talk per 1,000Team & front office talk per 1,000College sports talk per 1,000Off-field storylines per 1,000