Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Washington
Huskies
vs
Big Ten
Wisconsin
Badgers
On the field
Wisconsin won 1310 on Nov 8.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
WASH sentiment · 8,090 comments
Positive59.5%
Neutral9.6%
Negative28.9%
Mixed2%
WIS sentiment · 48,811 comments
Positive28.2%
Neutral11%
Negative59.1%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Washington
Wisconsin

Fan Score

594.6 (better)
281.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.5% (better)
28.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Washington
Wisconsin

Negativity

288.6 (better)
591

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

32.3 (better)
54.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

29.7 (better)
40.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Washington left, Wisconsin right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Washington
Wisconsin

Betting talk

2
13.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

104
222.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6.6
19.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Washington up, Wisconsin down
Washington positive ↑Wisconsin positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
WASH 10WIS 13
Washington had the happier comment section in 20 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin in 2. When they met on Nov 8, Wisconsin won 13–10; Wisconsin’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Washington and Wisconsin
Week ofWashington resultWashington positive shareWashington negative shareWisconsin resultWisconsin positive shareWisconsin negative share
2025-08-2358.6%27.1%W34.3%52.1%
2025-08-30W53.4%26.9%38.3%50.1%
2025-09-06W60.4%26.8%W32.4%56.2%
2025-09-1367.1%22.2%L19.2%67.5%
2025-09-20W70.3%20.7%L13.7%77.1%
2025-09-27L34%54.4%17.6%70.2%
2025-10-04W W81.5%11.2%L24.1%61.9%
2025-10-1173.3%18.4%L16.5%71.6%
2025-10-18L35.2%53.7%L19.1%67.6%
2025-10-25W68.9%20.5%L27.2%58%
2025-11-0173.3%15.7%22.7%60.6%
2025-11-08L14.3%75.8%W55.2%34%
2025-11-15W65.2%24.5%L36.8%48.9%
2025-11-22W63.4%22.2%W59.7%29.3%
2025-11-29L57.5%28.6%L25.6%56%
2025-12-0657.7%29.6%52.3%38.2%
2025-12-13W70.4%18.2%60.4%22.9%
2025-12-2044.7%34%40.4%44.2%
2025-12-2767.9%13.6%57.8%29.9%
2026-01-0337.2%46%41.5%42.9%
2026-01-1072%16.3%49%36.2%
2026-01-1780%17.5%50%42.9%
Reactions from that night · Nov 8
Washington

Let’s go DAWGS. Fans are being loud I heard the go huskies chant from my tv.

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

With three serious injuries 😢

negativeInjuriesFacebook
Wisconsin

The coaching situation has to change!! Fire Fickle!!

negativeCoachingFacebook

Once they fire Fickell and MacIntosh I will consider it.

negativeCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

WashingtonWisconsin
Harm · WIS +37 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · WIS +23 ptsExplicit Language · WIS +19 ptsCollege Sports · WIS +32 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WASH +51 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · WIS +68 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Washington Harm: 50th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Identity-Based Abuse: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Explicit Language: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington College Sports: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Off-Field Storylines: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Washington Team & Front Office: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Harm: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Explicit Language: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin College Sports: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Off-Field Storylines: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Sports Betting: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Washington's positive share was higher in 20 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin's in 2.

WASHWIS
0%41%82%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: WASH, WIS
Week ofWASHWISComments
2025-08-2358.6%34.3%2,547
2025-08-3053.4%38.3%1,183
2025-09-0660.4%32.4%2,817
2025-09-1367.1%19.2%4,329
2025-09-2070.3%13.7%6,153
2025-09-2734%17.6%1,801
2025-10-0481.5%24.1%3,268
2025-10-1173.3%16.5%7,735
2025-10-1835.2%19.1%5,449
2025-10-2568.9%27.2%2,920
2025-11-0173.3%22.7%1,435
2025-11-0814.3%55.2%4,876
2025-11-1565.2%36.8%2,722
2025-11-2263.4%59.7%2,771
2025-11-2957.5%25.6%3,217
2025-12-0657.7%52.3%677
2025-12-1370.4%60.4%339
2025-12-2044.7%40.4%151
2025-12-2767.9%57.8%228
2026-01-0337.2%41.5%1,422
2026-01-1072%49%453
2026-01-1780%50%408
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.