Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big 12
Utah
Utes
vs
Mountain West
Utah State
Aggies
UTAH sentiment · 16,435 comments
Positive55.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative33%
Mixed2%
USU sentiment · 2,439 comments
Positive78.2%
Neutral5.6%
Negative14.7%
Mixed1.5%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Utah
Utah State

Fan Score

559.4
(better)782.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

55.9%
(better)78.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Utah
Utah State

Negativity

330.1
(better)147.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

48.9
(better)13.5

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

35.3
(better)9

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Utah left, Utah State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Utah
Utah State

Betting talk

2.4
1.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

175.1
95.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.6
2.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Utah up, Utah State down
Utah positive ↑Utah State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Utah had the happier comment section in 2 of 21 shared weeks, Utah State in 19.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Utah and Utah State
Week ofUtah resultUtah positive shareUtah negative shareUtah State resultUtah State positive shareUtah State negative share
2025-08-2365.8%23.2%94%1.2%
2025-08-30W78.8%13.4%W91.7%3.3%
2025-09-06W58.2%27.9%L87.9%5.6%
2025-09-13W52.6%32%W84.8%4.5%
2025-09-20L27.9%61.4%W79.1%15.1%
2025-09-27W68%26.4%L82.7%3.8%
2025-10-0451.5%28.2%92.6%2.1%
2025-10-11W71.4%18.2%L W71.2%24.2%
2025-10-18L40.2%52.1%92%6.2%
2025-10-25W51%35.7%L66.1%25.2%
2025-11-01W62%27.3%83%5.7%
2025-11-0849.1%38.7%W90%4.7%
2025-11-15W66.8%22.2%L75.7%13.9%
2025-11-22W W47.9%41.9%W L89.3%5.4%
2025-11-2950.4%36.4%45%44.6%
2025-12-0665%21%70.4%22.2%
2025-12-1375.1%16.2%88.2%3.9%
2025-12-2035.3%35.3%L53.8%37.8%
2025-12-27W68.7%21.7%83.3%16.7%
2026-01-0358.1%30.5%74.2%18.9%
2026-01-1043%45.5%85.7%14.3%
2026-01-1753.1%34.4%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

UtahUtah State
Harm · UTAH +60 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · UTAH +52 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UTAH +62 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Utah Harm: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah Identity-Based Abuse: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah College Sports: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah Off-Field Storylines: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah Team & Front Office: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah State Harm: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Utah State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Utah State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Utah State Off-Field Storylines: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Utah State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Utah State Team & Front Office: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Utah's positive share was higher in 2 of 21 shared weeks, Utah State's in 19.

UTAHUSU
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UTAH, USU
Week ofUTAHUSUComments
2025-08-2365.8%94%238
2025-08-3078.8%91.7%1,047
2025-09-0658.2%87.9%997
2025-09-1352.6%84.8%1,033
2025-09-2027.9%79.1%1,743
2025-09-2768%82.7%540
2025-10-0451.5%92.6%300
2025-10-1171.4%71.2%583
2025-10-1840.2%92%1,026
2025-10-2551%66.1%1,263
2025-11-0162%83%1,014
2025-11-0849.1%90%333
2025-11-1566.8%75.7%944
2025-11-2247.9%89.3%2,426
2025-11-2950.4%45%758
2025-12-0665%70.4%806
2025-12-1375.1%88.2%942
2025-12-2035.3%53.8%173
2025-12-2768.7%83.3%1,423
2026-01-0358.1%74.2%884
2026-01-1043%85.7%337
2026-01-1753.1%0%64
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.