Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Toledo left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Toledo result | Toledo positive share | Toledo negative share | WKU result | WKU positive share | WKU negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 79% | 9.8% | W | 81.5% | 7.1% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 41% | 49.2% | W | 84.5% | 3.3% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 88.7% | 3.5% | L | 60.6% | 22.7% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 93.5% | 2.2% | – | 68.2% | 13.6% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 26.4% | 70.3% | W | 89.5% | 0% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 60.4% | 28.6% | W W | 86.1% | 5.7% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 60.2% | 30.7% | – | 84.8% | 8.4% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 18.5% | 77.5% | L | 37.5% | 43.3% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 41.4% | 49.7% | W | 85.1% | 6.9% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 27.8% | 64.8% | – | 90% | 0% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 56.8% | 32.1% | W | 98.6% | 0% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 65.1% | 26% | – | 72.7% | 3% |
| 2025-11-15 | – | 51.8% | 41.8% | W | 73.9% | 9.9% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 83.4% | 11.6% | L | 73.8% | 17.3% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 73% | 18% | L | 81.1% | 9.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 72.8% | 16.6% | – | 88.3% | 5.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 88.4% | 4.9% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2025-12-20 | L | 84.7% | 7.3% | W | 90.3% | 3.6% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 81% | 9.5% | – | 92.1% | 0% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 81.1% | 10.5% | – | 87.5% | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 70.6% | 11.9% | – | 87.5% | 0% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 82.5% | 6.7% | – | 100% | 0% |
“I LOVE IT , MIDNIGHT BLUE,, DO WE HAVE A GOLD LIGHT PACKAGE?”
“How can we watch the game?”
“Take it to them. Ground the Rockets ! Go Toppers”
“Pitiful. Time for Helton to go. Has never won an important road game. Too bad he’s extended until 2028.”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Toledo Harm: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Toledo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Toledo Explicit Language: 29th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Toledo College Sports: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Toledo Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Toledo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Toledo Team & Front Office: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
- WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Toledo's positive share was higher in 3 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 19.
| Week of | TOL | WKU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 79% | 81.5% | 311 |
| 2025-08-30 | 41% | 84.5% | 376 |
| 2025-09-06 | 88.7% | 60.6% | 181 |
| 2025-09-13 | 93.5% | 68.2% | 114 |
| 2025-09-20 | 26.4% | 89.5% | 234 |
| 2025-09-27 | 60.4% | 86.1% | 249 |
| 2025-10-04 | 60.2% | 84.8% | 266 |
| 2025-10-11 | 18.5% | 37.5% | 380 |
| 2025-10-18 | 41.4% | 85.1% | 333 |
| 2025-10-25 | 27.8% | 90% | 182 |
| 2025-11-01 | 56.8% | 98.6% | 154 |
| 2025-11-08 | 65.1% | 72.7% | 248 |
| 2025-11-15 | 51.8% | 73.9% | 271 |
| 2025-11-22 | 83.4% | 73.8% | 494 |
| 2025-11-29 | 73% | 81.1% | 477 |
| 2025-12-06 | 72.8% | 88.3% | 685 |
| 2025-12-13 | 88.4% | 100% | 324 |
| 2025-12-20 | 84.7% | 90.3% | 894 |
| 2025-12-27 | 81% | 92.1% | 59 |
| 2026-01-03 | 81.1% | 87.5% | 159 |
| 2026-01-10 | 70.6% | 87.5% | 142 |
| 2026-01-17 | 82.5% | 100% | 228 |