Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Texas left, UTEP right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Texas result | Texas positive share | Texas negative share | UTEP result | UTEP positive share | UTEP negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 67% | 18.5% | – | 74.5% | 12.8% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 40.1% | 49.2% | L | 58.2% | 35.2% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 52.2% | 36.5% | W | 78.3% | 13.3% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 34% | 55.1% | L | 74.2% | 16.5% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 28.6% | 59.7% | L | 43.2% | 48.1% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 62.3% | 23.6% | L | 37.4% | 50.5% |
| 2025-10-04 | L | 24.2% | 65.8% | L | 28.7% | 63.3% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 64.7% | 22.7% | W | 65.6% | 24.6% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 30.4% | 58.2% | – | 67.7% | 25.8% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 49.8% | 39.1% | L | 34.1% | 51.7% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 53.2% | 34.8% | – | 48.9% | 41.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | – | 55.2% | 33.3% | L | 51.5% | 37.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 31.1% | 58.5% | L | 50.6% | 40% |
| 2025-11-22 | W W | 56.3% | 33.8% | L | 32.2% | 57.9% |
| 2025-11-29 | – | 57.7% | 32.7% | L | 36.2% | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 43% | 40.3% | – | 35.1% | 62.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 59.4% | 24.9% | – | 35.7% | 46.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 77.4% | 15.9% | – | 38.7% | 48.4% |
| 2025-12-27 | W | 65.8% | 25.9% | – | 66.7% | 0% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 61.3% | 29.6% | – | 44.4% | 39.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 63.6% | 23.9% | – | 70.6% | 11.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 48.9% | 42.4% | – | 40.9% | 47% |
“I am glad my daughter will be Supporting Our Team as Student this coming Saturday in the Stadium she bleed Longhorns colors 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘👍💪💪💪👌”
“Can’t watch it thanks to the SEC Channel greed…”
“LETS GO MINERS!! Beat Texas!! #915 #chucotown Picks up!! 🏈⛏️🏈⛏️”
“Let’s Go Miners —Texas is vastly overrated”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Texas Harm: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Identity-Based Abuse: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Explicit Language: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas College Sports: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Off-Field Storylines: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Sports Betting: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Team & Front Office: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UTEP Harm: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UTEP Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- UTEP Explicit Language: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UTEP College Sports: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UTEP Off-Field Storylines: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UTEP Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- UTEP Team & Front Office: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Texas's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, UTEP's in 11.
| Week of | TEX | UTEP | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 67% | 74.5% | 2,876 |
| 2025-08-30 | 40.1% | 58.2% | 10,324 |
| 2025-09-06 | 52.2% | 78.3% | 5,944 |
| 2025-09-13 | 34% | 74.2% | 5,204 |
| 2025-09-20 | 28.6% | 43.2% | 10,124 |
| 2025-09-27 | 62.3% | 37.4% | 1,215 |
| 2025-10-04 | 24.2% | 28.7% | 5,642 |
| 2025-10-11 | 64.7% | 65.6% | 5,855 |
| 2025-10-18 | 30.4% | 67.7% | 5,696 |
| 2025-10-25 | 49.8% | 34.1% | 5,930 |
| 2025-11-01 | 53.2% | 48.9% | 5,594 |
| 2025-11-08 | 55.2% | 51.5% | 2,643 |
| 2025-11-15 | 31.1% | 50.6% | 9,767 |
| 2025-11-22 | 56.3% | 32.2% | 7,469 |
| 2025-11-29 | 57.7% | 36.2% | 11,696 |
| 2025-12-06 | 43% | 35.1% | 3,244 |
| 2025-12-13 | 59.4% | 35.7% | 1,470 |
| 2025-12-20 | 77.4% | 38.7% | 1,062 |
| 2025-12-27 | 65.8% | 66.7% | 7,933 |
| 2026-01-03 | 61.3% | 44.4% | 753 |
| 2026-01-10 | 63.6% | 70.6% | 828 |
| 2026-01-17 | 48.9% | 40.9% | 561 |