Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Texas
Longhorns
vs
Sun Belt
Texas State
Bobcats
TEX sentiment · 106,632 comments
Positive46.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative42.2%
Mixed1.9%
TXST sentiment · 2,245 comments
Positive70.8%
Neutral9.4%
Negative18.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Texas
Texas State

Fan Score

468.7
(better)707.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

46.9%
(better)70.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Texas
Texas State

Negativity

421.6
(better)186.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

69.4
(better)8.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

48.5
(better)17.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Texas left, Texas State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Texas
Texas State

Betting talk

2.3
3.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

96.9
84.2

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.7
2.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Texas up, Texas State down
Texas positive ↑Texas State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Texas had the happier comment section in 3 of 21 shared weeks, Texas State in 18.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Texas and Texas State
Week ofTexas resultTexas positive shareTexas negative shareTexas State resultTexas State positive shareTexas State negative share
2025-08-2367%18.5%76.9%0%
2025-08-30L40.1%49.2%W77.1%1.4%
2025-09-06W52.2%36.5%W89.3%2.8%
2025-09-13W34%55.1%L69.6%18.8%
2025-09-20W28.6%59.7%W77.4%7.5%
2025-09-2762.3%23.6%60%0%
2025-10-04L24.2%65.8%L37.4%52.8%
2025-10-11W64.7%22.7%L33.6%55.5%
2025-10-18W30.4%58.2%L32.9%55.9%
2025-10-25W49.8%39.1%L42.4%50.5%
2025-11-01W53.2%34.8%60%28%
2025-11-0855.2%33.3%L34%60.6%
2025-11-15L31.1%58.5%W84.3%9.6%
2025-11-22W W56.3%33.8%W88.7%1.6%
2025-11-2957.7%32.7%W88.1%2%
2025-12-0643%40.3%100%0%
2025-12-1359.4%24.9%83.3%0%
2025-12-2077.4%15.9%87.5%0%
2025-12-27W65.8%25.9%W77.9%11.7%
2026-01-0361.3%29.6%90.7%4%
2026-01-1063.6%23.9%
2026-01-1748.9%42.4%83.1%6%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

TexasTexas State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · TEX +48 ptsCollege Sports · TXST +42 ptsOff-Field Storylines · TEX +13 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · TEX +10 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Texas Harm: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas Identity-Based Abuse: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas Explicit Language: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas College Sports: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas Off-Field Storylines: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas Sports Betting: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas Team & Front Office: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Explicit Language: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State College Sports: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Off-Field Storylines: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Team & Front Office: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Texas's positive share was higher in 4 of 21 shared weeks, Texas State's in 17.

TEXTXST
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: TEX, TXST
Week ofTEXTXSTComments
2025-08-2367%76.9%2,795
2025-08-3040.1%77.1%10,204
2025-09-0652.2%89.3%5,996
2025-09-1334%69.6%4,685
2025-09-2028.6%77.4%9,812
2025-09-2762.3%60%896
2025-10-0424.2%37.4%5,375
2025-10-1164.7%33.6%5,608
2025-10-1830.4%32.9%5,808
2025-10-2549.8%42.4%5,739
2025-11-0153.2%60%5,552
2025-11-0855.2%34%2,531
2025-11-1531.1%84.3%9,627
2025-11-2256.3%88.7%7,134
2025-11-2957.7%88.1%11,519
2025-12-0643%100%3,185
2025-12-1359.4%83.3%1,137
2025-12-2077.4%87.5%1,039
2025-12-2765.8%77.9%8,081
2026-01-0361.3%90.7%765
2026-01-1063.6%0%811
2026-01-1748.9%83.1%578
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.