Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Texas Tech left, Utah right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Texas Tech result | Texas Tech positive share | Texas Tech negative share | Utah result | Utah positive share | Utah negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 69% | 14.2% | – | 65.8% | 23.2% |
| 2025-08-30 | W | 53.3% | 25.7% | W | 78.8% | 13.4% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 68.2% | 17.4% | W | 58.2% | 27.9% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 77.7% | 9.2% | W | 52.6% | 32% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 73% | 17.4% | L | 27.9% | 61.4% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 71.1% | 13.8% | W | 68% | 26.4% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 57.6% | 31.5% | – | 51.5% | 28.2% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 74.5% | 14.7% | W | 71.4% | 18.2% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 46.7% | 42.7% | L | 40.2% | 52.1% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 70.2% | 17.5% | W | 51% | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 68.8% | 16.4% | W | 62% | 27.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 73% | 16.5% | – | 49.1% | 38.7% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 80.9% | 9% | W | 66.8% | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-22 | – | 80.9% | 9.1% | W W | 47.9% | 41.9% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 85.6% | 7.8% | – | 50.4% | 36.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | W | 85.3% | 8.1% | – | 65% | 21% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 91.1% | 4.7% | – | 75.1% | 16.2% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 79.1% | 13% | – | 35.3% | 35.3% |
| 2025-12-27 | L | 57.1% | 33.9% | W | 68.7% | 21.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 77.3% | 17.2% | – | 58.1% | 30.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 90.5% | 5.5% | – | 43% | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 78.2% | 12.2% | – | 53.1% | 34.4% |
“Let’s go guys!!!! Wreck the Utes!”
“Nah whoever at the media team made this cultured”
“Fox big noon kickoff team”
“Ready for your first loss utie fan?”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Texas Tech Harm: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Explicit Language: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech College Sports: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Off-Field Storylines: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Sports Betting: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Team & Front Office: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Harm: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Identity-Based Abuse: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah College Sports: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Off-Field Storylines: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Utah Team & Front Office: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Texas Tech's positive share was higher in 20 of 22 shared weeks, Utah's in 2.
| Week of | TTU | UTAH | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 69% | 65.8% | 548 |
| 2025-08-30 | 53.3% | 78.8% | 2,035 |
| 2025-09-06 | 68.2% | 58.2% | 1,979 |
| 2025-09-13 | 77.7% | 52.6% | 2,441 |
| 2025-09-20 | 73% | 27.9% | 3,556 |
| 2025-09-27 | 71.1% | 68% | 1,307 |
| 2025-10-04 | 57.6% | 51.5% | 3,166 |
| 2025-10-11 | 74.5% | 71.4% | 2,934 |
| 2025-10-18 | 46.7% | 40.2% | 3,175 |
| 2025-10-25 | 70.2% | 51% | 2,946 |
| 2025-11-01 | 68.8% | 62% | 4,406 |
| 2025-11-08 | 73% | 49.1% | 3,888 |
| 2025-11-15 | 80.9% | 66.8% | 2,660 |
| 2025-11-22 | 80.9% | 47.9% | 3,875 |
| 2025-11-29 | 85.6% | 50.4% | 5,251 |
| 2025-12-06 | 85.3% | 65% | 9,041 |
| 2025-12-13 | 91.1% | 75.1% | 2,493 |
| 2025-12-20 | 79.1% | 35.3% | 1,067 |
| 2025-12-27 | 57.1% | 68.7% | 10,264 |
| 2026-01-03 | 77.3% | 58.1% | 1,801 |
| 2026-01-10 | 90.5% | 43% | 1,227 |
| 2026-01-17 | 78.2% | 53.1% | 972 |