Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Tennessee left, UAB right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Tennessee result | Tennessee positive share | Tennessee negative share | UAB result | UAB positive share | UAB negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 68.1% | 13.2% | W | 48.8% | 34.3% |
| 2025-08-30 | W | 66.3% | 21.1% | – | 53.7% | 14.6% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 66.5% | 17.5% | L | 60% | 16.7% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 59.5% | 26.3% | W | 50% | 32.9% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 56.9% | 29% | L | 33.9% | 54% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 64.5% | 24.6% | – | 23.5% | 35.3% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 62.8% | 20.2% | L | 19.1% | 71.7% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 58% | 30.5% | L | 34.8% | 47.1% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 47.3% | 39.3% | W | 83.6% | 9.1% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 61.1% | 22.5% | – | 78.8% | 6.1% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 42% | 43.9% | L | 67.8% | 19.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | – | 48.3% | 27.5% | L | 55.1% | 29.9% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 56.6% | 25.1% | L | 71.2% | 22.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 72.2% | 18.7% | L | 69.2% | 14.4% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 54% | 38% | W | 65.6% | 26.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 51.2% | 33.1% | – | 62.5% | 24.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 66.7% | 23.9% | – | 80.1% | 12.4% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 82.3% | 8.7% | – | 87.8% | 2.7% |
| 2025-12-27 | L | 35.6% | 55.8% | – | 75% | 18.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 48.1% | 37.2% | – | 83.7% | 7.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 63.8% | 20.1% | – | 84.7% | 5.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 75.5% | 18.2% | – | 68.1% | 19.1% |
“I can’t stand Mike Keith my god”
“1:30- finally make it to ur seats after standing inline for hour and a half”
“Go get yourself a real victory and rip them goal posts down good luck play the best you can and be proud of it win or lose”
“And we have a coach on his phone? Bad look.”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Tennessee Harm: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee Identity-Based Abuse: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee Explicit Language: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee Sports Betting: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tennessee Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UAB Harm: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UAB Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- UAB Explicit Language: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UAB College Sports: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UAB Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UAB Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- UAB Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Tennessee's positive share was higher in 10 of 22 shared weeks, UAB's in 12.
| Week of | TENN | UAB | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 68.1% | 48.8% | 2,941 |
| 2025-08-30 | 66.3% | 53.7% | 3,957 |
| 2025-09-06 | 66.5% | 60% | 3,138 |
| 2025-09-13 | 59.5% | 50% | 2,102 |
| 2025-09-20 | 56.9% | 33.9% | 2,759 |
| 2025-09-27 | 64.5% | 23.5% | 4,721 |
| 2025-10-04 | 62.8% | 19.1% | 1,884 |
| 2025-10-11 | 58% | 34.8% | 3,682 |
| 2025-10-18 | 47.3% | 83.6% | 3,041 |
| 2025-10-25 | 61.1% | 78.8% | 3,815 |
| 2025-11-01 | 42% | 67.8% | 2,475 |
| 2025-11-08 | 48.3% | 55.1% | 1,928 |
| 2025-11-15 | 56.6% | 71.2% | 3,031 |
| 2025-11-22 | 72.2% | 69.2% | 4,238 |
| 2025-11-29 | 54% | 65.6% | 2,735 |
| 2025-12-06 | 51.2% | 62.5% | 3,065 |
| 2025-12-13 | 66.7% | 80.1% | 761 |
| 2025-12-20 | 82.3% | 87.8% | 441 |
| 2025-12-27 | 35.6% | 75% | 3,958 |
| 2026-01-03 | 48.1% | 83.7% | 1,127 |
| 2026-01-10 | 63.8% | 84.7% | 376 |
| 2026-01-17 | 75.5% | 68.1% | 729 |