Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Southern Miss left, UL Monroe right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Southern Miss result | Southern Miss positive share | Southern Miss negative share | UL Monroe result | UL Monroe positive share | UL Monroe negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 58% | 16.5% | W | 76.8% | 4.2% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 65.9% | 22% | – | 78.5% | 6.3% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 73% | 15.4% | L | 84% | 8% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 81.7% | 9.7% | – | 81.8% | 9.1% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 60.7% | 24% | W | 82.4% | 4.5% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 83% | 6.7% | W | 88.4% | 5.4% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 80% | 10.5% | L | 80.4% | 15.2% |
| 2025-10-11 | – | 84.8% | 10.9% | L | 47.6% | 11.9% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 85% | 5.6% | L | 48% | 24% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 89.3% | 5.6% | L | 70.8% | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 77.5% | 10.8% | L | 47.5% | 35.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 79.8% | 9.2% | – | 66.7% | 0% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 63.5% | 28.9% | L | 30.8% | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 64.1% | 27.1% | L | 48.9% | 37.8% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 68.9% | 16.4% | L | 61.9% | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 63.2% | 22.7% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 87.1% | 7.1% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2025-12-20 | L | 75.1% | 19% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 75.2% | 19% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 83.3% | 4.2% | – | 83.3% | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 80% | 10% | – | 80% | 0% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 65.5% | 3.4% | – | 0% | 100% |
“It’s Goint To Be The Perfect Halloween 🎃 Game!!! Battle Between Each Section To See Who Has The Best Costumes!!!! Don’t Let “Section F Win!”!!!!🏆 👻 🦅 🔥”
“Walk that W Coach Huff. I like that right there right there. Huff and Coaching Team has 'W's.”
“Talons out! I’m super excited for Landon Graves to get a shot at QB. Hoping Monroe will come on out and support a hometown kid at our next home game. Our Warhawks DESERVE better crowds win or lose.”
“My football hero, one of my life heroes!”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UL Monroe Harm: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe College Sports: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- UL Monroe Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Southern Miss's positive share was higher in 9 of 22 shared weeks, UL Monroe's in 11.
| Week of | USM | ULM | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 58% | 76.8% | 636 |
| 2025-08-30 | 65.9% | 78.5% | 683 |
| 2025-09-06 | 73% | 84% | 635 |
| 2025-09-13 | 81.7% | 81.8% | 442 |
| 2025-09-20 | 60.7% | 82.4% | 372 |
| 2025-09-27 | 83% | 88.4% | 400 |
| 2025-10-04 | 80% | 80.4% | 351 |
| 2025-10-11 | 84.8% | 47.6% | 226 |
| 2025-10-18 | 85% | 48% | 344 |
| 2025-10-25 | 89.3% | 70.8% | 474 |
| 2025-11-01 | 77.5% | 47.5% | 179 |
| 2025-11-08 | 79.8% | 66.7% | 502 |
| 2025-11-15 | 63.5% | 30.8% | 185 |
| 2025-11-22 | 64.1% | 48.9% | 329 |
| 2025-11-29 | 68.9% | 61.9% | 225 |
| 2025-12-06 | 63.2% | 100% | 582 |
| 2025-12-13 | 87.1% | 100% | 180 |
| 2025-12-20 | 75.1% | 100% | 263 |
| 2025-12-27 | 75.2% | 100% | 115 |
| 2026-01-03 | 83.3% | 83.3% | 30 |
| 2026-01-10 | 80% | 80% | 65 |
| 2026-01-17 | 65.5% | 0% | 30 |