Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Southern Miss
Golden Eagles
vs
American
UAB
Blazers
USM sentiment · 6,305 comments
Positive73.6%
Neutral10.4%
Negative14.9%
Mixed1%
UAB sentiment · 3,196 comments
Positive60.1%
Neutral10.1%
Negative27.5%
Mixed2.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Southern Miss
UAB

Fan Score

736.4 (better)
600.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.6% (better)
60.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Southern Miss
UAB

Negativity

149.1 (better)
275

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

16.3 (better)
24.1

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

7.3 (better)
8.1

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Southern Miss left, UAB right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Southern Miss
UAB

Betting talk

2.4
0.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

144.3
223.4

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

7.1
6.9

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Southern Miss up, UAB down
Southern Miss positive ↑UAB positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Southern Miss had the happier comment section in 17 of 22 shared weeks, UAB in 5.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Southern Miss and UAB
Week ofSouthern Miss resultSouthern Miss positive shareSouthern Miss negative shareUAB resultUAB positive shareUAB negative share
2025-08-2358%16.5%W48.8%34.3%
2025-08-30L65.9%22%53.7%14.6%
2025-09-06W73%15.4%L60%16.7%
2025-09-13W81.7%9.7%W50%32.9%
2025-09-20L60.7%24%L33.9%54%
2025-09-27W83%6.7%23.5%35.3%
2025-10-04W80%10.5%L19.1%71.7%
2025-10-1184.8%10.9%L34.8%47.1%
2025-10-18W85%5.6%W83.6%9.1%
2025-10-25W89.3%5.6%78.8%6.1%
2025-11-0177.5%10.8%L67.8%19.5%
2025-11-08W79.8%9.2%L55.1%29.9%
2025-11-15L63.5%28.9%L71.2%22.5%
2025-11-22L64.1%27.1%L69.2%14.4%
2025-11-29L68.9%16.4%W65.6%26.7%
2025-12-0663.2%22.7%62.5%24.3%
2025-12-1387.1%7.1%80.1%12.4%
2025-12-20L75.1%19%87.8%2.7%
2025-12-2775.2%19%75%18.8%
2026-01-0383.3%4.2%83.7%7.8%
2026-01-1080%10%84.7%5.6%
2026-01-1765.5%3.4%68.1%19.1%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Southern MissUAB
Harm · UAB +19 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · UAB +5 ptsCollege Sports · USM +50 ptsOff-Field Storylines · UAB +40 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UAB +28 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Harm: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UAB Explicit Language: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB College Sports: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UAB Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UAB Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Southern Miss's positive share was higher in 16 of 22 shared weeks, UAB's in 6.

USMUAB
0%45%89%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: USM, UAB
Week ofUSMUABComments
2025-08-2358%48.8%748
2025-08-3065.9%53.7%645
2025-09-0673%60%620
2025-09-1381.7%50%501
2025-09-2060.7%33.9%320
2025-09-2783%23.5%287
2025-10-0480%19.1%478
2025-10-1184.8%34.8%630
2025-10-1885%83.6%648
2025-10-2589.3%78.8%483
2025-11-0177.5%67.8%207
2025-11-0879.8%55.1%606
2025-11-1563.5%71.2%270
2025-11-2264.1%69.2%388
2025-11-2968.9%65.6%613
2025-12-0663.2%62.5%827
2025-12-1387.1%80.1%421
2025-12-2075.1%87.8%327
2025-12-2775.2%75%121
2026-01-0383.3%83.7%153
2026-01-1080%84.7%132
2026-01-1765.5%68.1%76
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.