Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Southern Miss left, Troy right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Southern Miss result | Southern Miss positive share | Southern Miss negative share | Troy result | Troy positive share | Troy negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 58% | 16.5% | – | 52.1% | 4.2% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 65.9% | 22% | W | 82.5% | 7.9% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 73% | 15.4% | L | 81.4% | 11% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 81.7% | 9.7% | L | 57.3% | 24.7% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 60.7% | 24% | W | 84.6% | 10.1% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 83% | 6.7% | – | 82.3% | 2.5% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 80% | 10.5% | W | 78.7% | 9.4% |
| 2025-10-11 | – | 84.8% | 10.9% | W | 92.1% | 3.4% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 85% | 5.6% | W | 86.9% | 4.5% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 89.3% | 5.6% | W | 91.4% | 4% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 77.5% | 10.8% | L | 61.6% | 27.9% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 79.8% | 9.2% | L | 56.9% | 34.9% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 63.5% | 28.9% | – | 70.7% | 5.2% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 64.1% | 27.1% | W | 88.2% | 3.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 68.9% | 16.4% | W L | 90.2% | 4.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 63.2% | 22.7% | – | 58.6% | 26.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 87.1% | 7.1% | L | 74.8% | 16.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | L | 75.1% | 19% | – | 86.7% | 6.7% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 75.2% | 19% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 83.3% | 4.2% | – | 95.3% | 1.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 80% | 10% | – | 93.2% | 1.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 65.5% | 3.4% | – | 87.8% | 1% |
“What time is eagle walk this weekend anyone know?”
“Biggest home game in a decade (sadly it will be 60% empty stadium)”
“We are there with you in spirit. Lets go get that win. ❤️⚔️🏈❤️⚔️🏈❤️⚔️🏈. The SOTS pep band will be there. #blowsots! 🎺🎺🎺”
“Safe travels! We will be in Hattiesburg tomorrow repping our power T's at the zoo! ⚔️⚔️”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Troy Harm: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Troy Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Troy Explicit Language: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Troy College Sports: 12th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Troy Off-Field Storylines: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Troy Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Troy Team & Front Office: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Southern Miss's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Troy's in 14.
| Week of | USM | TROY | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 58% | 52.1% | 589 |
| 2025-08-30 | 65.9% | 82.5% | 896 |
| 2025-09-06 | 73% | 81.4% | 823 |
| 2025-09-13 | 81.7% | 57.3% | 520 |
| 2025-09-20 | 60.7% | 84.6% | 494 |
| 2025-09-27 | 83% | 82.3% | 332 |
| 2025-10-04 | 80% | 78.7% | 700 |
| 2025-10-11 | 84.8% | 92.1% | 537 |
| 2025-10-18 | 85% | 86.9% | 610 |
| 2025-10-25 | 89.3% | 91.4% | 624 |
| 2025-11-01 | 77.5% | 61.6% | 310 |
| 2025-11-08 | 79.8% | 56.9% | 731 |
| 2025-11-15 | 63.5% | 70.7% | 217 |
| 2025-11-22 | 64.1% | 88.2% | 471 |
| 2025-11-29 | 68.9% | 90.2% | 1,087 |
| 2025-12-06 | 63.2% | 58.6% | 1,552 |
| 2025-12-13 | 87.1% | 74.8% | 495 |
| 2025-12-20 | 75.1% | 86.7% | 268 |
| 2025-12-27 | 75.2% | 100% | 119 |
| 2026-01-03 | 83.3% | 95.3% | 88 |
| 2026-01-10 | 80% | 93.2% | 119 |
| 2026-01-17 | 65.5% | 87.8% | 127 |