Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
South Carolina left, Virginia Tech right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | South Carolina result | South Carolina positive share | South Carolina negative share | Virginia Tech result | Virginia Tech positive share | Virginia Tech negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 67.1% | 14% | – | 69.1% | 20.6% |
| 2025-08-30 | W | 69.6% | 17% | L | 36.2% | 52.9% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 48.8% | 32.5% | L | 17.3% | 73.1% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 43.1% | 44% | L | 17.7% | 75.6% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 35.5% | 54.3% | W | 56.5% | 34.5% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 61.7% | 28.2% | W | 66.7% | 23.4% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 76.5% | 9.1% | L | 33.5% | 56.9% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 35.9% | 54.8% | L | 34.7% | 54.3% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 28.4% | 61.3% | W | 68.8% | 18.2% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 44.5% | 46.5% | – | 61.2% | 30.2% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 31.5% | 59.4% | L | 37.8% | 51.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | – | 49.2% | 20.8% | – | 73.4% | 18.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 26% | 64.1% | L | 44.5% | 45.6% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 55.2% | 30.5% | L | 43.7% | 45% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 44.3% | 46% | L | 35.9% | 55% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 40.4% | 43.8% | – | 32.3% | 57.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 60.3% | 30.4% | – | 42.6% | 35.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 49.3% | 35.2% | – | 61.9% | 26.2% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 49.1% | 28.3% | – | 41.7% | 45.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 61.1% | 24.6% | – | 64.7% | 26.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 60.7% | 25.8% | – | 30.6% | 48.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 64.9% | 22% | – | 68.8% | 22.6% |
“From a Clemson fan, I hope y’all win tomorrow. I’m pulling for you to bring home a victory.”
“ATL is always packed! Join the crowd! Fun times ahead! 🦊😊”
“Here's the link for the streamed: https://www.festival.sport-affclub.com/hsfootball.php”
“I was there when his car got struck by lightening! He shouldn’t have picked the other team at Lane Stadium! Go Hokies!”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- South Carolina Harm: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Identity-Based Abuse: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina College Sports: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Sports Betting: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Team & Front Office: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Harm: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Explicit Language: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech College Sports: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Off-Field Storylines: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Sports Betting: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Virginia Tech Team & Front Office: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. South Carolina's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, Virginia Tech's in 11.
| Week of | SCAR | VT | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 67.1% | 69.1% | 720 |
| 2025-08-30 | 69.6% | 36.2% | 4,112 |
| 2025-09-06 | 48.8% | 17.3% | 3,095 |
| 2025-09-13 | 43.1% | 17.7% | 2,891 |
| 2025-09-20 | 35.5% | 56.5% | 1,541 |
| 2025-09-27 | 61.7% | 66.7% | 1,734 |
| 2025-10-04 | 76.5% | 33.5% | 912 |
| 2025-10-11 | 35.9% | 34.7% | 1,541 |
| 2025-10-18 | 28.4% | 68.8% | 1,639 |
| 2025-10-25 | 44.5% | 61.2% | 1,486 |
| 2025-11-01 | 31.5% | 37.8% | 924 |
| 2025-11-08 | 49.2% | 73.4% | 194 |
| 2025-11-15 | 26% | 44.5% | 6,482 |
| 2025-11-22 | 55.2% | 43.7% | 2,223 |
| 2025-11-29 | 44.3% | 35.9% | 3,458 |
| 2025-12-06 | 40.4% | 32.3% | 1,419 |
| 2025-12-13 | 60.3% | 42.6% | 586 |
| 2025-12-20 | 49.3% | 61.9% | 113 |
| 2025-12-27 | 49.1% | 41.7% | 300 |
| 2026-01-03 | 61.1% | 64.7% | 344 |
| 2026-01-10 | 60.7% | 30.6% | 471 |
| 2026-01-17 | 64.9% | 68.8% | 434 |