Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
Sam Houston
Bearkats
vs
Sun Belt
Texas State
Bobcats
SHSU sentiment · 2,438 comments
Positive59.3%
Neutral12.5%
Negative26.6%
Mixed1.7%
TXST sentiment · 2,245 comments
Positive70.8%
Neutral9.4%
Negative18.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Sam Houston
Texas State

Fan Score

592.7
(better)707.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.3%
(better)70.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Sam Houston
Texas State

Negativity

265.8
(better)186.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

11.1
(better)8.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

10.7 (better)
17.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Sam Houston left, Texas State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Sam Houston
Texas State

Betting talk

4.1
3.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

135.4
84.2

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

18
2.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Sam Houston up, Texas State down
Sam Houston positive ↑Texas State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Sam Houston had the happier comment section in 7 of 19 shared weeks, Texas State in 12.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Sam Houston and Texas State
Week ofSam Houston resultSam Houston positive shareSam Houston negative shareTexas State resultTexas State positive shareTexas State negative share
2025-08-23L L57.7%23.9%76.9%0%
2025-08-3055.6%30.3%W77.1%1.4%
2025-09-06L61%19.1%W89.3%2.8%
2025-09-1367.6%22.1%L69.6%18.8%
2025-09-20L45.3%31.6%W77.4%7.5%
2025-09-27L37.3%51.8%60%0%
2025-10-04L42.3%39.1%L37.4%52.8%
2025-10-11L39.8%45.3%L33.6%55.5%
2025-10-1859.1%27.3%L32.9%55.9%
2025-10-25L71.4%22.1%L42.4%50.5%
2025-11-0137.6%51.5%60%28%
2025-11-08W84.8%6.3%L34%60.6%
2025-11-15W84.6%4.7%W84.3%9.6%
2025-11-22L63.4%22.6%W88.7%1.6%
2025-11-29L73.4%15.7%W88.1%2%
2025-12-0693.3%0%100%0%
2025-12-1333.3%0%83.3%0%
2025-12-20100%0%87.5%0%
2025-12-2740%20%W77.9%11.7%
2026-01-0390.7%4%
2026-01-1095.8%1.4%
2026-01-1783.1%6%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Sam HoustonTexas State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · TXST +20 ptsCollege Sports · SHSU +41 ptsOff-Field Storylines · SHSU +53 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · SHSU +51 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Sam Houston Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Explicit Language: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston College Sports: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Off-Field Storylines: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Team & Front Office: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Explicit Language: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State College Sports: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Off-Field Storylines: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Texas State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Texas State Team & Front Office: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Sam Houston's positive share was higher in 7 of 19 shared weeks, Texas State's in 12.

SHSUTXST
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: SHSU, TXST
Week ofSHSUTXSTComments
2025-08-2357.7%76.9%155
2025-08-3055.6%77.1%352
2025-09-0661%89.3%593
2025-09-1367.6%69.6%180
2025-09-2045.3%77.4%378
2025-09-2737.3%60%120
2025-10-0442.3%37.4%376
2025-10-1139.8%33.6%280
2025-10-1859.1%32.9%165
2025-10-2571.4%42.4%176
2025-11-0137.6%60%244
2025-11-0884.8%34%331
2025-11-1584.6%84.3%264
2025-11-2263.4%88.7%155
2025-11-2973.4%88.1%475
2025-12-0693.3%100%33
2025-12-1333.3%83.3%9
2025-12-20100%87.5%9
2025-12-2740%77.9%159
2026-01-030%90.7%75
2026-01-1095.8%0%71
2026-01-170%83.1%83
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.