Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Oregon
Ducks
vs
ACC
Stanford
Cardinal
ORE sentiment · 33,527 comments
Positive55.1%
Neutral10.7%
Negative32.2%
Mixed2%
STAN sentiment · 3,877 comments
Positive53.8%
Neutral10.9%
Negative32.9%
Mixed2.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Oregon
Stanford

Fan Score

551.2 (better)
538.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

55.1% (better)
53.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Oregon
Stanford

Negativity

321.5 (better)
329.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

51.5
(better)34.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

50.4
(better)19.1

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Oregon left, Stanford right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Oregon
Stanford

Betting talk

6.8
6.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

115
172

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.4
17.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Oregon up, Stanford down
Oregon positive ↑Stanford positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Oregon had the happier comment section in 12 of 22 shared weeks, Stanford in 10.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Oregon and Stanford
Week ofOregon resultOregon positive shareOregon negative shareStanford resultStanford positive shareStanford negative share
2025-08-2367.6%12.9%L31.3%58.2%
2025-08-30W65.1%19.4%58.8%27.5%
2025-09-06W61.6%24.2%L35.6%54%
2025-09-13W54.5%28.4%W73%13.5%
2025-09-20W56.3%26.8%L63.5%22.2%
2025-09-27W64.7%25.8%W69.3%17.3%
2025-10-0466.4%16%58.1%18.5%
2025-10-11L32.6%56.2%L50.9%38.2%
2025-10-18W57.8%24.6%W67.4%15.4%
2025-10-25W43.5%38.3%L33.6%57.6%
2025-11-0168.5%19.9%L24.5%60%
2025-11-08W W59.1%28.8%L30.3%53.5%
2025-11-1563.9%22.1%57.7%30.1%
2025-11-22W66.7%23.1%W71.2%16.1%
2025-11-29W67.7%21.4%L48.8%40.1%
2025-12-0664.4%21.5%58.1%25.8%
2025-12-1372.3%16.1%65.9%21.6%
2025-12-20W45.1%42.4%78.6%7.1%
2025-12-27W60.3%29.1%75%25%
2026-01-03L75.6%12.4%57.5%12.5%
2026-01-1025.2%63.2%83.3%5.6%
2026-01-1734%38.3%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

OregonStanford
Harm · ORE +26 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · ORE +48 ptsCollege Sports · STAN +92 ptsOff-Field Storylines · ORE +18 ptsSports Betting · ORE +1 ptsTeam & Front Office · STAN +44 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Oregon Harm: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Identity-Based Abuse: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Explicit Language: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon College Sports: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Off-Field Storylines: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Sports Betting: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Team & Front Office: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford Harm: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Stanford Explicit Language: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford College Sports: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford Off-Field Storylines: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford Sports Betting: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Stanford Team & Front Office: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Oregon's positive share was higher in 12 of 22 shared weeks, Stanford's in 10.

ORESTAN
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: ORE, STAN
Week ofORESTANComments
2025-08-2367.6%31.3%749
2025-08-3065.1%58.8%993
2025-09-0661.6%35.6%1,520
2025-09-1354.5%73%1,651
2025-09-2056.3%63.5%1,511
2025-09-2764.7%69.3%2,295
2025-10-0466.4%58.1%544
2025-10-1132.6%50.9%2,469
2025-10-1857.8%67.4%1,498
2025-10-2543.5%33.6%1,255
2025-11-0168.5%24.5%513
2025-11-0859.1%30.3%3,680
2025-11-1563.9%57.7%932
2025-11-2266.7%71.2%1,952
2025-11-2967.7%48.8%2,930
2025-12-0664.4%58.1%1,201
2025-12-1372.3%65.9%665
2025-12-2045.1%78.6%2,306
2025-12-2760.3%75%3,576
2026-01-0375.6%57.5%1,604
2026-01-1025.2%83.3%3,512
2026-01-1734%100%48
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.