Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Oregon
Ducks
vs
Big Ten
Rutgers
Scarlet Knights
On the field
Oregon won 5610 on Oct 18.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
ORE sentiment · 33,527 comments
Positive55.1%
Neutral10.7%
Negative32.2%
Mixed2%
RUTG sentiment · 5,649 comments
Positive50.9%
Neutral9.3%
Negative37.5%
Mixed2.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Oregon
Rutgers

Fan Score

551.2 (better)
508.6

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

55.1% (better)
50.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Oregon
Rutgers

Negativity

321.5 (better)
374.6

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

51.5
(better)34.7

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

50.4
(better)13.6

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.4Race0.7
1.8Gender1.1
0.7Age0.2

Oregon left, Rutgers right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Oregon
Rutgers

Betting talk

6.8
5.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

115
107.6

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.4
11.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Oregon up, Rutgers down
Oregon positive ↑Rutgers positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
ORE 56RUTG 10
Oregon had the happier comment section in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Rutgers in 9. When they met on Oct 18, Oregon won 56–10; Oregon’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Oregon and Rutgers
Week ofOregon resultOregon positive shareOregon negative shareRutgers resultRutgers positive shareRutgers negative share
2025-08-2367.6%12.9%W49.3%35.5%
2025-08-30W65.1%19.4%53.6%38.1%
2025-09-06W61.6%24.2%W63.6%23.2%
2025-09-13W54.5%28.4%W L53.8%30.8%
2025-09-20W56.3%26.8%36.2%53.3%
2025-09-27W64.7%25.8%L33.9%56.6%
2025-10-0466.4%16%L81.1%10%
2025-10-11L32.6%56.2%27.1%60.2%
2025-10-18W57.8%24.6%L39.4%48.4%
2025-10-25W43.5%38.3%W64.5%24.6%
2025-11-0168.5%19.9%L55.1%34.8%
2025-11-08W W59.1%28.8%W63.1%28%
2025-11-1563.9%22.1%70.7%17.9%
2025-11-22W66.7%23.1%L34.8%53%
2025-11-29W67.7%21.4%L34.6%53.3%
2025-12-0664.4%21.5%69%24.1%
2025-12-1372.3%16.1%50%0%
2025-12-20W45.1%42.4%66.7%33.3%
2025-12-27W60.3%29.1%16.7%50%
2026-01-03L75.6%12.4%74.1%22.2%
2026-01-1025.2%63.2%78.3%8.7%
2026-01-1734%38.3%70.7%18.7%
Reactions from that night · Oct 18
Oregon

We will be cheering in Duck fashion (loudly) tomorrow! Try to sleep on the flight! GO DUCKS!

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Go kick ass leave no doubt

positiveExplicit WordsFacebook
Rutgers

George F. Baier oh yeah let’s cry about the red color shade and not donate to NIL, shall we? LOL and SMH

negativeNILFacebook

Taking bets now on a final score.... Oregon 63, RU 3.

negativeProp BetFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

OregonRutgers
Harm · ORE +21 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · ORE +52 ptsExplicit Language · ORE +60 ptsCollege Sports · RUTG +81 ptsOff-Field Storylines · ORE +42 ptsSports Betting · ORE +8 ptsTeam & Front Office · ORE +6 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Oregon Harm: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Identity-Based Abuse: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Explicit Language: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon College Sports: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Off-Field Storylines: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Sports Betting: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oregon Team & Front Office: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Harm: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Identity-Based Abuse: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Explicit Language: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers College Sports: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Off-Field Storylines: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Sports Betting: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Rutgers Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Oregon's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Rutgers's in 9.

ORERUTG
0%41%81%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: ORE, RUTG
Week ofORERUTGComments
2025-08-2367.6%49.3%732
2025-08-3065.1%53.6%1,026
2025-09-0661.6%63.6%1,595
2025-09-1354.5%53.8%1,907
2025-09-2056.3%36.2%1,748
2025-09-2764.7%33.9%2,515
2025-10-0466.4%81.1%510
2025-10-1132.6%27.1%2,470
2025-10-1857.8%39.4%1,388
2025-10-2543.5%64.5%1,682
2025-11-0168.5%55.1%541
2025-11-0859.1%63.1%4,332
2025-11-1563.9%70.7%1,082
2025-11-2266.7%34.8%1,582
2025-11-2967.7%34.6%3,227
2025-12-0664.4%69%1,199
2025-12-1372.3%50%581
2025-12-2045.1%66.7%2,295
2025-12-2760.3%16.7%3,574
2026-01-0375.6%74.1%1,551
2026-01-1025.2%78.3%3,517
2026-01-1734%70.7%122
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.