Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Oklahoma State left, Texas Tech right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Oklahoma State result | Oklahoma State positive share | Oklahoma State negative share | Texas Tech result | Texas Tech positive share | Texas Tech negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | W | 53.5% | 30.2% | – | 69% | 14.2% |
| 2025-08-30 | – | 47.6% | 39.8% | W | 53.3% | 25.7% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 28.9% | 42.1% | W | 68.2% | 17.4% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 49% | 36.7% | W | 77.7% | 9.2% |
| 2025-09-20 | – | 40% | 46.1% | W | 73% | 17.4% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | 51.8% | 34.4% | – | 71.1% | 13.8% |
| 2025-10-04 | L | 43.1% | 43% | W | 57.6% | 31.5% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 57.8% | 30.8% | W | 74.5% | 14.7% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 45.8% | 41.5% | L | 46.7% | 42.7% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 46.8% | 41.8% | W | 70.2% | 17.5% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 52.9% | 33.3% | W | 68.8% | 16.4% |
| 2025-11-08 | – | 50.3% | 37.9% | W | 73% | 16.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 58.3% | 28.7% | W | 80.9% | 9% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 51.3% | 34.8% | – | 80.9% | 9.1% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 65.7% | 21.8% | W | 85.6% | 7.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 66.3% | 22.7% | W | 85.3% | 8.1% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 59.4% | 27.5% | – | 91.1% | 4.7% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 66.9% | 17.8% | – | 79.1% | 13% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 55% | 31.4% | L | 57.1% | 33.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 51.1% | 33.2% | – | 77.3% | 17.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 57.5% | 33.1% | – | 90.5% | 5.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 32.4% | 48.9% | – | 78.2% | 12.2% |
“Trolling ? he shoplifted from Walmart, call a spade a spade . Call it like I see it. so quit your crying , and my life is awesome”
“Here's the link for the streamed https://www.baasith3k.king-cpasports.com/hsfootball.php”
“Are they looking for a better coach?”
“I agree and I know it was huge. Our chances of making the CFP are slim and out of our hands now. Also it was play calling not the play that cost the game and sooo frustrating.”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Oklahoma State Harm: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State Identity-Based Abuse: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State Explicit Language: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State College Sports: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State Off-Field Storylines: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Oklahoma State Team & Front Office: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Harm: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Explicit Language: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech College Sports: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Off-Field Storylines: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Sports Betting: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas Tech Team & Front Office: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Oklahoma State's positive share was higher in 0 of 22 shared weeks, Texas Tech's in 22.
| Week of | OKST | TTU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 53.5% | 69% | 3,155 |
| 2025-08-30 | 47.6% | 53.3% | 2,458 |
| 2025-09-06 | 28.9% | 68.2% | 4,198 |
| 2025-09-13 | 49% | 77.7% | 2,267 |
| 2025-09-20 | 40% | 73% | 4,843 |
| 2025-09-27 | 51.8% | 71.1% | 2,198 |
| 2025-10-04 | 43.1% | 57.6% | 3,965 |
| 2025-10-11 | 57.8% | 74.5% | 3,587 |
| 2025-10-18 | 45.8% | 46.7% | 3,006 |
| 2025-10-25 | 46.8% | 70.2% | 2,667 |
| 2025-11-01 | 52.9% | 68.8% | 4,039 |
| 2025-11-08 | 50.3% | 73% | 4,182 |
| 2025-11-15 | 58.3% | 80.9% | 2,661 |
| 2025-11-22 | 51.3% | 80.9% | 4,026 |
| 2025-11-29 | 65.7% | 85.6% | 5,631 |
| 2025-12-06 | 66.3% | 85.3% | 10,178 |
| 2025-12-13 | 59.4% | 91.1% | 2,274 |
| 2025-12-20 | 66.9% | 79.1% | 1,207 |
| 2025-12-27 | 55% | 57.1% | 9,038 |
| 2026-01-03 | 51.1% | 77.3% | 2,160 |
| 2026-01-10 | 57.5% | 90.5% | 1,057 |
| 2026-01-17 | 32.4% | 78.2% | 1,260 |