Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Notre Dame left, Texas A&M right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Notre Dame result | Notre Dame positive share | Notre Dame negative share | Texas A&M result | Texas A&M positive share | Texas A&M negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 72.7% | 15.7% | – | 51.6% | 37.5% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 32.5% | 54.8% | W | 44.9% | 40% |
| 2025-09-06 | – | 44.3% | 40.7% | W | 56.8% | 29.5% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 33.4% | 52.5% | W | 74.2% | 15.8% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 52.6% | 35.3% | – | 64.4% | 16.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 68.8% | 21.7% | W | 55.6% | 29.2% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 61.3% | 25.9% | W | 58.6% | 26.9% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 59.6% | 31.3% | W | 65.8% | 21.8% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 61.4% | 28.8% | W | 50.6% | 35.1% |
| 2025-10-25 | – | 68.4% | 17.4% | W | 69.9% | 20.4% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 46.8% | 40.8% | – | 64.4% | 15.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 71.2% | 17.2% | W | 76.6% | 13% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 67.8% | 21.4% | W | 58% | 30.1% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 66.5% | 23% | W L | 66.5% | 21.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 58.3% | 29.1% | – | 32.5% | 57.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 39.9% | 50.2% | – | 51.6% | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 73.8% | 19.7% | – | 62.1% | 24.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 32.7% | 57.5% | L | 28.8% | 61.2% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 35.6% | 53.4% | – | 47.1% | 43.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 61.5% | 24.5% | – | 40.4% | 47.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 48.2% | 40.7% | – | 41% | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 47.1% | 41.1% | – | 50.5% | 4.2% |
“The digital production team in the athletics department has been killing it lately. This video was awesome!”
“We don’t need the new age announcers…. Just play the music and video clips…. And as always….Go Irish!”
“All this to lose in Austin”
“Would love if they add a small Charlie Kirk sticker”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Notre Dame Harm: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame Identity-Based Abuse: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame Explicit Language: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame College Sports: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame Off-Field Storylines: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Notre Dame Team & Front Office: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Harm: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Identity-Based Abuse: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Explicit Language: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M College Sports: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Team & Front Office: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Notre Dame's positive share was higher in 10 of 22 shared weeks, Texas A&M's in 11.
| Week of | ND | TAMU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 72.7% | 51.6% | 1,019 |
| 2025-08-30 | 32.5% | 44.9% | 4,587 |
| 2025-09-06 | 44.3% | 56.8% | 1,170 |
| 2025-09-13 | 33.4% | 74.2% | 5,056 |
| 2025-09-20 | 52.6% | 64.4% | 3,720 |
| 2025-09-27 | 68.8% | 55.6% | 3,899 |
| 2025-10-04 | 61.3% | 58.6% | 6,412 |
| 2025-10-11 | 59.6% | 65.8% | 5,462 |
| 2025-10-18 | 61.4% | 50.6% | 8,308 |
| 2025-10-25 | 68.4% | 69.9% | 7,571 |
| 2025-11-01 | 46.8% | 64.4% | 4,978 |
| 2025-11-08 | 71.2% | 76.6% | 8,706 |
| 2025-11-15 | 67.8% | 58% | 15,137 |
| 2025-11-22 | 66.5% | 66.5% | 10,043 |
| 2025-11-29 | 58.3% | 32.5% | 14,649 |
| 2025-12-06 | 39.9% | 51.6% | 15,714 |
| 2025-12-13 | 73.8% | 62.1% | 5,167 |
| 2025-12-20 | 32.7% | 28.8% | 8,079 |
| 2025-12-27 | 35.6% | 47.1% | 1,632 |
| 2026-01-03 | 61.5% | 40.4% | 1,360 |
| 2026-01-10 | 48.2% | 41% | 1,072 |
| 2026-01-17 | 47.1% | 50.5% | 1,912 |