Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Northwestern
Wildcats
vs
SEC
Vanderbilt
Commodores
NU sentiment · 1,838 comments
Positive67.1%
Neutral9.8%
Negative21.5%
Mixed1.6%
VANDY sentiment · 22,930 comments
Positive62.2%
Neutral9.8%
Negative26.8%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Northwestern
Vanderbilt

Fan Score

671.4 (better)
622.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

67.1% (better)
62.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Northwestern
Vanderbilt

Negativity

214.9 (better)
267.9

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

30.5 (better)
79.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

21.8 (better)
34.2

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Northwestern left, Vanderbilt right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Northwestern
Vanderbilt

Betting talk

7.1
1.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

169.2
84.6

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

9.2
4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Northwestern up, Vanderbilt down
Northwestern positive ↑Vanderbilt positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Northwestern had the happier comment section in 9 of 20 shared weeks, Vanderbilt in 11.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Northwestern and Vanderbilt
Week ofNorthwestern resultNorthwestern positive shareNorthwestern negative shareVanderbilt resultVanderbilt positive shareVanderbilt negative share
2025-08-23100%0%74.2%9.1%
2025-08-30L W12.1%78.8%W73.3%15.2%
2025-09-0650.6%33.3%W78%8%
2025-09-13L50%35%W71.8%15.7%
2025-09-2070.8%29.2%W71%13.2%
2025-09-27W64.8%25.4%W78.6%11.4%
2025-10-04W75.4%6.2%L51.4%36.4%
2025-10-11W75%14.4%74.7%13.7%
2025-10-18W76.8%14.1%W77.2%9.4%
2025-10-25L56%36%W75.1%11.5%
2025-11-01L68.8%31.3%L54.2%34.1%
2025-11-0894.7%0%W74.9%15.8%
2025-11-15L39.3%46.4%78.5%9%
2025-11-22W86.7%7.6%W73.9%12.8%
2025-11-29L88.2%2%W56.5%33.1%
2025-12-0668.3%11.1%59%32.1%
2025-12-1340.4%50.1%
2025-12-20W66%28.3%53.7%37.8%
2025-12-2754%32%L50.9%36.9%
2026-01-0360.4%17.6%71.1%18.8%
2026-01-1025%75%76.6%14.2%
2026-01-1788.9%8%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

NorthwesternVanderbilt
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Northwestern Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Northwestern Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Vanderbilt Harm: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt Identity-Based Abuse: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt Explicit Language: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt College Sports: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt Off-Field Storylines: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt Sports Betting: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Vanderbilt Team & Front Office: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Northwestern's positive share was higher in 10 of 20 shared weeks, Vanderbilt's in 10.

NUVANDY
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NU, VANDY
Week ofNUVANDYComments
2025-08-23100%74.2%193
2025-08-3012.1%73.3%650
2025-09-0650.6%78%907
2025-09-1350%71.8%1,203
2025-09-2070.8%71%772
2025-09-2764.8%78.6%675
2025-10-0475.4%51.4%799
2025-10-1175%74.7%474
2025-10-1876.8%77.2%1,323
2025-10-2556%75.1%929
2025-11-0168.8%54.2%725
2025-11-0894.7%74.9%1,525
2025-11-1539.3%78.5%441
2025-11-2286.7%73.9%1,331
2025-11-2988.2%56.5%3,451
2025-12-0668.3%59%3,554
2025-12-130%40.4%3,173
2025-12-2066%53.7%413
2025-12-2754%50.9%1,520
2026-01-0360.4%71.1%219
2026-01-1025%76.6%329
2026-01-170%88.9%162
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.