Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
New Mexico State
Aggies
vs
C-USA
WKU
Hilltoppers
On the field
WKU won 3516 on Nov 1.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
NMSU sentiment · 1,564 comments
Positive73.4%
Neutral9.7%
Negative15.7%
Mixed1.2%
WKU sentiment · 2,689 comments
Positive82.2%
Neutral8%
Negative8.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

New Mexico State
WKU

Fan Score

734
(better)822.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.4%
(better)82.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

New Mexico State
WKU

Negativity

156.6
(better)85.5

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

6.4
(better)5.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

3.8
(better)1.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

New Mexico State left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

New Mexico State
WKU

Betting talk

3.2
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

70.3
38.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.5
4.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: New Mexico State up, WKU down
New Mexico State positive ↑WKU positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
NMSU 16WKU 35
New Mexico State had the happier comment section in 5 of 22 shared weeks, WKU in 16. When they met on Nov 1, WKU won 35–16; WKU’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for New Mexico State and WKU
Week ofNew Mexico State resultNew Mexico State positive shareNew Mexico State negative shareWKU resultWKU positive shareWKU negative share
2025-08-2373.1%7.7%W81.5%7.1%
2025-08-30W69.4%16.3%W84.5%3.3%
2025-09-06W85.5%4.2%L60.6%22.7%
2025-09-13L82.9%7.1%68.2%13.6%
2025-09-2090.8%7.9%W89.5%0%
2025-09-27L W77.4%13.2%W W86.1%5.7%
2025-10-0486.8%10.5%84.8%8.4%
2025-10-11L46.3%41.8%L37.5%43.3%
2025-10-18L54.2%33.3%W85.1%6.9%
2025-10-2570.4%18.5%90%0%
2025-11-01L68.3%14.3%W98.6%0%
2025-11-08L63.6%27.3%72.7%3%
2025-11-15L67.3%12.2%W73.9%9.9%
2025-11-22W84.3%9.1%L73.8%17.3%
2025-11-29L59.5%25%L81.1%9.8%
2025-12-06100%0%88.3%5.3%
2025-12-1351.6%31.2%100%0%
2025-12-200%75%W90.3%3.6%
2025-12-270%50%92.1%0%
2026-01-0370%20%87.5%12.5%
2026-01-1033.3%0%87.5%0%
2026-01-17100%0%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Nov 1
New Mexico State

Get rid of david yost....this offense sux. Bench Fife....sorry but this dude can't work through progression and throwing to triple coverage!! Defense has been great. Not there fault when offense can't do nothing!!

negativeCoachingFacebook

NM State Offer Allen Evans 6'2 185 CB Trinity High School In Louisville Kentucky Scholarship 2025-2026

neutralRecruitingFacebook
WKU

Congratulations team 👏#15

positiveFacebook

Let's Gooooooooo Son #11gooooooo

positiveFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

New Mexico StateWKU
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • New Mexico State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. New Mexico State's positive share was higher in 7 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 14.

NMSUWKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NMSU, WKU
Week ofNMSUWKUComments
2025-08-2373.1%81.5%220
2025-08-3069.4%84.5%230
2025-09-0685.5%60.6%280
2025-09-1382.9%68.2%92
2025-09-2090.8%89.5%162
2025-09-2777.4%86.1%370
2025-10-0486.8%84.8%216
2025-10-1146.3%37.5%171
2025-10-1854.2%85.1%308
2025-10-2570.4%90%47
2025-11-0168.3%98.6%136
2025-11-0863.6%72.7%77
2025-11-1567.3%73.9%210
2025-11-2284.3%73.8%587
2025-11-2959.5%81.1%216
2025-12-06100%88.3%101
2025-12-1351.6%100%150
2025-12-200%90.3%584
2025-12-270%92.1%40
2026-01-0370%87.5%26
2026-01-1033.3%87.5%19
2026-01-17100%100%11
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.