Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
New Mexico State
Aggies
vs
American
Tulsa
Golden Hurricane
On the field
New Mexico State won 2114 on Sep 6.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
NMSU sentiment · 1,564 comments
Positive73.4%
Neutral9.7%
Negative15.7%
Mixed1.2%
TLSA sentiment · 2,677 comments
Positive83.9%
Neutral7.7%
Negative7.7%
Mixed0.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

New Mexico State
Tulsa

Fan Score

734
(better)839

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.4%
(better)83.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

New Mexico State
Tulsa

Negativity

156.6
(better)77.3

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

6.4 (better)
7.1

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

3.8 (better)
8.2

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

New Mexico State left, Tulsa right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

New Mexico State
Tulsa

Betting talk

3.2
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

70.3
64.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.5
9.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: New Mexico State up, Tulsa down
New Mexico State positive ↑Tulsa positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
NMSU 21TLSA 14
New Mexico State had the happier comment section in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Tulsa in 14. When they met on Sep 6, New Mexico State won 21–14; New Mexico State’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for New Mexico State and Tulsa
Week ofNew Mexico State resultNew Mexico State positive shareNew Mexico State negative shareTulsa resultTulsa positive shareTulsa negative share
2025-08-2373.1%7.7%70%7.5%
2025-08-30W69.4%16.3%W90%1.5%
2025-09-06W85.5%4.2%L79.3%15%
2025-09-13L82.9%7.1%L W74.3%16.2%
2025-09-2090.8%7.9%84.9%9.7%
2025-09-27L W77.4%13.2%L64.7%19.1%
2025-10-0486.8%10.5%L75.6%14.4%
2025-10-11L46.3%41.8%L87.2%8.5%
2025-10-18L54.2%33.3%85.5%5.5%
2025-10-2570.4%18.5%L81.3%8.3%
2025-11-01L68.3%14.3%87.8%2%
2025-11-08L63.6%27.3%L68.8%16.3%
2025-11-15L67.3%12.2%W96.3%1.6%
2025-11-22W84.3%9.1%W90.2%5%
2025-11-29L59.5%25%L80.9%8%
2025-12-06100%0%95%0%
2025-12-1351.6%31.2%94.7%0%
2025-12-200%75%100%0%
2025-12-270%50%64.2%14.6%
2026-01-0370%20%81.6%5.7%
2026-01-1033.3%0%91.3%0%
2026-01-17100%0%89.4%4.5%
Reactions from that night · Sep 6
New Mexico State

How about 6000 student fans !!!!!!!

positiveStudent SectionFacebook

College kids love to tailgate - 👍🏼Ok but then go to the game , cheer on the Aggies and stay til the end . They feel your support . After the game - go back and celebrate wisely !!🎉🥰👍🏼🏈📣

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook
Tulsa

Eat ‘em up! Beat ‘em up! GO TU!!!👑🌀

positiveViolent LanguageFacebook

Great start to the coach Lamb era!

positiveCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

New Mexico StateTulsa
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • New Mexico State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Tulsa Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Tulsa Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Tulsa Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Tulsa College Sports: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tulsa Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tulsa Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Tulsa Team & Front Office: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. New Mexico State's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Tulsa's in 14.

NMSUTLSA
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NMSU, TLSA
Week ofNMSUTLSAComments
2025-08-2373.1%70%92
2025-08-3069.4%90%250
2025-09-0685.5%79.3%354
2025-09-1382.9%74.3%206
2025-09-2090.8%84.9%407
2025-09-2777.4%64.7%280
2025-10-0486.8%75.6%128
2025-10-1146.3%87.2%161
2025-10-1854.2%85.5%175
2025-10-2570.4%81.3%75
2025-11-0168.3%87.8%112
2025-11-0863.6%68.8%124
2025-11-1567.3%96.3%239
2025-11-2284.3%90.2%713
2025-11-2959.5%80.9%283
2025-12-06100%95%27
2025-12-1351.6%94.7%131
2025-12-200%100%24
2025-12-270%64.2%125
2026-01-0370%81.6%168
2026-01-1033.3%91.3%95
2026-01-17100%89.4%72
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.