Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Mountain West
Nevada
Wolf Pack
vs
C-USA
WKU
Hilltoppers
On the field
WKU won 3116 on Sep 20.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
NEV sentiment · 1,086 comments
Positive64.8%
Neutral8.9%
Negative25.1%
Mixed1.1%
WKU sentiment · 2,689 comments
Positive82.2%
Neutral8%
Negative8.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Nevada
WKU

Fan Score

648.3
(better)822.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

64.8%
(better)82.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Nevada
WKU

Negativity

251.4
(better)85.5

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

27.6
(better)5.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

27.6
(better)1.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Nevada left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Nevada
WKU

Betting talk

3.7
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

94.8
38.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.8
4.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Nevada up, WKU down
Nevada positive ↑WKU positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
NEV 16WKU 31
Nevada had the happier comment section in 4 of 22 shared weeks, WKU in 18. When they met on Sep 20, WKU won 31–16; WKU’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Nevada and WKU
Week ofNevada resultNevada positive shareNevada negative shareWKU resultWKU positive shareWKU negative share
2025-08-2344.4%16.7%W81.5%7.1%
2025-08-30L73%18.9%W84.5%3.3%
2025-09-06W63.5%27.6%L60.6%22.7%
2025-09-13L66%30%68.2%13.6%
2025-09-20L66.7%33.3%W89.5%0%
2025-09-2742.9%44.9%W W86.1%5.7%
2025-10-04L66.7%0%84.8%8.4%
2025-10-11L40.9%50%L37.5%43.3%
2025-10-18L L51%38.8%W85.1%6.9%
2025-10-2554.1%27.9%90%0%
2025-11-0162.5%25%W98.6%0%
2025-11-08L72.2%11.1%72.7%3%
2025-11-15W79.4%14.7%W73.9%9.9%
2025-11-22W83.9%11.3%L73.8%17.3%
2025-11-29L43.6%43.6%L81.1%9.8%
2025-12-0669.2%7.7%88.3%5.3%
2025-12-1382.4%5.9%100%0%
2025-12-2082.1%10.3%W90.3%3.6%
2025-12-2776.5%17.6%92.1%0%
2026-01-0392.9%0%87.5%12.5%
2026-01-10100%0%87.5%0%
2026-01-1772.7%9.1%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Sep 20
Nevada

I think you are a very good football player. One of the best if QB could ever hit you.

positiveFacebook

Love his presence and his attitude towards his teammates. As a grandma, I enjoy watching my grandsons teammates discuss their experiences and how they play the game. Howls to the whole program!! 🐺🏈🤍🩶💙

positiveFacebook
WKU

it's GAMEDAY will be broadcast live on Here: #WATCH2025NCAAFOOTBALL

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Just curious as to why black helmets on parents weekend when they tell everyone to wear red? Why not red helmets or the big red eyes??? Would look a lot better

negativeFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

NevadaWKU
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Nevada Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Nevada Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Nevada's positive share was higher in 6 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 16.

NEVWKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NEV, WKU
Week ofNEVWKUComments
2025-08-2344.4%81.5%186
2025-08-3073%84.5%255
2025-09-0663.5%60.6%236
2025-09-1366%68.2%72
2025-09-2066.7%89.5%89
2025-09-2742.9%86.1%207
2025-10-0466.7%84.8%181
2025-10-1140.9%37.5%170
2025-10-1851%85.1%237
2025-10-2554.1%90%81
2025-11-0162.5%98.6%105
2025-11-0872.2%72.7%51
2025-11-1579.4%73.9%365
2025-11-2283.9%73.8%375
2025-11-2943.6%81.1%233
2025-12-0669.2%88.3%120
2025-12-1382.4%100%74
2025-12-2082.1%90.3%619
2025-12-2776.5%92.1%55
2026-01-0392.9%87.5%30
2026-01-10100%87.5%18
2026-01-1772.7%100%16
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.