Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Nebraska
Cornhuskers
vs
Big Ten
Wisconsin
Badgers
NEB sentiment · 47,727 comments
Positive46.6%
Neutral8.9%
Negative42.5%
Mixed2%
WIS sentiment · 48,811 comments
Positive28.2%
Neutral11%
Negative59.1%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Nebraska
Wisconsin

Fan Score

466 (better)
281.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

46.6% (better)
28.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Nebraska
Wisconsin

Negativity

425.4 (better)
591

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

57.8
(better)54.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

41.5
(better)40.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Nebraska left, Wisconsin right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Nebraska
Wisconsin

Betting talk

3.7
13.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

135
222.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
19.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Nebraska up, Wisconsin down
Nebraska positive ↑Wisconsin positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Nebraska had the happier comment section in 17 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin in 5.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Nebraska and Wisconsin
Week ofNebraska resultNebraska positive shareNebraska negative shareWisconsin resultWisconsin positive shareWisconsin negative share
2025-08-23W51.4%35.5%W34.3%52.1%
2025-08-3064.1%23.3%38.3%50.1%
2025-09-06W56%30%W32.4%56.2%
2025-09-13W62.3%25.6%L19.2%67.5%
2025-09-20L34.1%56.3%L13.7%77.1%
2025-09-2773.9%17.6%17.6%70.2%
2025-10-04W55.5%34.5%L24.1%61.9%
2025-10-11W L64.6%24.8%L16.5%71.6%
2025-10-1819.4%71.3%L19.1%67.6%
2025-10-25W49.6%39.6%L27.2%58%
2025-11-01L31.3%57.6%22.7%60.6%
2025-11-08W65.3%24.6%W55.2%34%
2025-11-1566.1%18.7%L36.8%48.9%
2025-11-22L L28.6%62%W59.7%29.3%
2025-11-2959.3%32.9%L25.6%56%
2025-12-0641.5%46.7%52.3%38.2%
2025-12-1348.5%37.1%60.4%22.9%
2025-12-2074.6%18.6%40.4%44.2%
2025-12-27L30.2%58.9%57.8%29.9%
2026-01-0353.9%30.9%41.5%42.9%
2026-01-1063.5%24.2%49%36.2%
2026-01-1768%24.8%50%42.9%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

NebraskaWisconsin
Harm · WIS +2 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · NEB +33 ptsExplicit Language · NEB +2 ptsCollege Sports · WIS +27 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WIS +2 ptsSports Betting · WIS +33 ptsTeam & Front Office · WIS +33 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Harm: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Explicit Language: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin College Sports: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Off-Field Storylines: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Sports Betting: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Nebraska's positive share was higher in 18 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin's in 4.

NEBWIS
0%37%75%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NEB, WIS
Week ofNEBWISComments
2025-08-2351.4%34.3%6,391
2025-08-3064.1%38.3%1,662
2025-09-0656%32.4%5,473
2025-09-1362.3%19.2%6,307
2025-09-2034.1%13.7%8,184
2025-09-2773.9%17.6%1,540
2025-10-0455.5%24.1%4,975
2025-10-1164.6%16.5%11,174
2025-10-1819.4%19.1%8,691
2025-10-2549.6%27.2%5,514
2025-11-0131.3%22.7%4,479
2025-11-0865.3%55.2%8,288
2025-11-1566.1%36.8%2,902
2025-11-2228.6%59.7%6,865
2025-11-2959.3%25.6%4,182
2025-12-0641.5%52.3%1,084
2025-12-1348.5%60.4%423
2025-12-2074.6%40.4%415
2025-12-2730.2%57.8%4,343
2026-01-0353.9%41.5%1,875
2026-01-1063.5%49%943
2026-01-1768%50%828
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.