Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Nebraska
Cornhuskers
vs
American
Temple
Owls
NEB sentiment · 47,727 comments
Positive46.6%
Neutral8.9%
Negative42.5%
Mixed2%
TEM sentiment · 1,915 comments
Positive73.9%
Neutral9.2%
Negative15.9%
Mixed1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Nebraska
Temple

Fan Score

466
(better)738.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

46.6%
(better)73.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Nebraska
Temple

Negativity

425.4
(better)158.7

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

57.8
(better)16.7

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

41.5
(better)7.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Nebraska left, Temple right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Nebraska
Temple

Betting talk

3.7
4.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

135
101.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
5.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Nebraska up, Temple down
Nebraska positive ↑Temple positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Nebraska had the happier comment section in 4 of 22 shared weeks, Temple in 18.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Nebraska and Temple
Week ofNebraska resultNebraska positive shareNebraska negative shareTemple resultTemple positive shareTemple negative share
2025-08-23W51.4%35.5%82.2%4.1%
2025-08-3064.1%23.3%W88.7%6.2%
2025-09-06W56%30%W83.2%6.7%
2025-09-13W62.3%25.6%L61%25%
2025-09-20L34.1%56.3%L78.8%12.9%
2025-09-2773.9%17.6%88.6%0%
2025-10-04W55.5%34.5%W80.5%7.3%
2025-10-11W L64.6%24.8%L63%23.9%
2025-10-1819.4%71.3%W83%9.4%
2025-10-25W49.6%39.6%W85.2%8.9%
2025-11-01L31.3%57.6%L75.2%17.7%
2025-11-08W65.3%24.6%L76.2%7.1%
2025-11-1566.1%18.7%87.2%2.6%
2025-11-22L L28.6%62%L L68.6%21.6%
2025-11-2959.3%32.9%75.4%16.9%
2025-12-0641.5%46.7%24.2%57%
2025-12-1348.5%37.1%33.3%0%
2025-12-2074.6%18.6%100%0%
2025-12-27L30.2%58.9%100%0%
2026-01-0353.9%30.9%68.2%18.2%
2026-01-1063.5%24.2%70%10%
2026-01-1768%24.8%0%100%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

NebraskaTemple
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Temple Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Temple Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Nebraska's positive share was higher in 5 of 22 shared weeks, Temple's in 17.

NEBTEM
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NEB, TEM
Week ofNEBTEMComments
2025-08-2351.4%82.2%4,057
2025-08-3064.1%88.7%1,116
2025-09-0656%83.2%3,159
2025-09-1362.3%61%2,321
2025-09-2034.1%78.8%3,183
2025-09-2773.9%88.6%388
2025-10-0455.5%80.5%2,444
2025-10-1164.6%63%3,988
2025-10-1819.4%83%3,801
2025-10-2549.6%85.2%3,142
2025-11-0131.3%75.2%3,329
2025-11-0865.3%76.2%3,888
2025-11-1566.1%87.2%590
2025-11-2228.6%68.6%4,958
2025-11-2959.3%75.4%1,614
2025-12-0641.5%24.2%964
2025-12-1348.5%33.3%378
2025-12-2074.6%100%318
2025-12-2730.2%100%4,198
2026-01-0353.9%68.2%588
2026-01-1063.5%70%757
2026-01-1768%0%461
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.