Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Nebraska
Cornhuskers
vs
SEC
Oklahoma
Sooners
NEB sentiment · 47,727 comments
Positive46.6%
Neutral8.9%
Negative42.5%
Mixed2%
OU sentiment · 76,815 comments
Positive52.5%
Neutral10.3%
Negative35.4%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Nebraska
Oklahoma

Fan Score

466
(better)524.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

46.6%
(better)52.5%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Nebraska
Oklahoma

Negativity

425.4
(better)354.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

57.8
(better)51.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

41.5
(better)39.9

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.6Race0.5
2.8Gender2.3
0.7LGBTQIA+1.1
1.6Age1.5

Nebraska left, Oklahoma right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Nebraska
Oklahoma

Betting talk

3.7
2.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

135
137.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
3.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Nebraska up, Oklahoma down
Nebraska positive ↑Oklahoma positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Nebraska had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Oklahoma in 15.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Nebraska and Oklahoma
Week ofNebraska resultNebraska positive shareNebraska negative shareOklahoma resultOklahoma positive shareOklahoma negative share
2025-08-23W51.4%35.5%70.5%14.8%
2025-08-3064.1%23.3%W53.9%27.3%
2025-09-06W56%30%W67.8%20.8%
2025-09-13W62.3%25.6%W66.8%21.6%
2025-09-20L34.1%56.3%W43.7%43.4%
2025-09-2773.9%17.6%56%28.7%
2025-10-04W55.5%34.5%W69.9%19.4%
2025-10-11W L64.6%24.8%L31.2%57.8%
2025-10-1819.4%71.3%W51.1%36.4%
2025-10-25W49.6%39.6%L27.1%62.5%
2025-11-01L31.3%57.6%W50.3%35.5%
2025-11-08W65.3%24.6%64.9%22.6%
2025-11-1566.1%18.7%W60.8%28.5%
2025-11-22L L28.6%62%W53.2%35.2%
2025-11-2959.3%32.9%W53.7%34.4%
2025-12-0641.5%46.7%61.6%24%
2025-12-1348.5%37.1%L74.5%16.6%
2025-12-2074.6%18.6%30.7%59.6%
2025-12-27L30.2%58.9%52.7%40.5%
2026-01-0353.9%30.9%71.7%22%
2026-01-1063.5%24.2%62.8%21.3%
2026-01-1768%24.8%69.4%17.7%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

NebraskaOklahoma
Harm · NEB +2 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · NEB +23 ptsExplicit Language · NEB +3 ptsCollege Sports · NEB +61 ptsOff-Field Storylines · OU +55 ptsSports Betting · NEB +37 ptsTeam & Front Office · OU +2 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Harm: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Identity-Based Abuse: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Explicit Language: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma College Sports: 7th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Off-Field Storylines: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Sports Betting: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Oklahoma Team & Front Office: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Nebraska's positive share was higher in 9 of 22 shared weeks, Oklahoma's in 13.

NEBOU
0%37%75%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: NEB, OU
Week ofNEBOUComments
2025-08-2351.4%70.5%4,671
2025-08-3064.1%53.9%4,275
2025-09-0656%67.8%7,599
2025-09-1362.3%66.8%4,751
2025-09-2034.1%43.7%10,618
2025-09-2773.9%56%2,070
2025-10-0455.5%69.9%5,777
2025-10-1164.6%31.2%9,485
2025-10-1819.4%51.1%6,207
2025-10-2549.6%27.1%7,398
2025-11-0131.3%50.3%8,930
2025-11-0865.3%64.9%5,053
2025-11-1566.1%60.8%8,143
2025-11-2228.6%53.2%10,099
2025-11-2959.3%53.7%8,872
2025-12-0641.5%61.6%4,009
2025-12-1348.5%74.5%3,818
2025-12-2074.6%30.7%4,765
2025-12-2730.2%52.7%4,327
2026-01-0353.9%71.7%725
2026-01-1063.5%62.8%1,643
2026-01-1768%69.4%1,307
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.