Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Minnesota
Golden Gophers
vs
Mountain West
New Mexico
Lobos
On the field
Minnesota won 2017 (OT) on Dec 26 at a neutral site.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
MINN sentiment · 16,116 comments
Positive39.7%
Neutral10.9%
Negative47.3%
Mixed2.1%
UNM sentiment · 8,500 comments
Positive83.6%
Neutral6.4%
Negative8.5%
Mixed1.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Minnesota
New Mexico

Fan Score

396.7
(better)836.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

39.7%
(better)83.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Minnesota
New Mexico

Negativity

472.8
(better)85.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

62.3
(better)10.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

16.7
(better)2.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.7Race0.2
2.7Gender0.6
1.6Age0.1

Minnesota left, New Mexico right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Minnesota
New Mexico

Betting talk

4.2
2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

144.3
127.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

15.3
2.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Minnesota up, New Mexico down
Minnesota positive ↑New Mexico positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
MINN 20UNM 17
Minnesota had the happier comment section in 0 of 22 shared weeks, New Mexico in 22. When they met on Dec 26, Minnesota won 20–17 (OT); New Mexico’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Minnesota and New Mexico
Week ofMinnesota resultMinnesota positive shareMinnesota negative shareNew Mexico resultNew Mexico positive shareNew Mexico negative share
2025-08-23W54%31.4%77.6%8.5%
2025-08-3043.6%46.1%L79.6%13.7%
2025-09-06W37.2%45%W W92.1%1.5%
2025-09-13L23.2%66%85.9%8.3%
2025-09-2053.5%32.4%78.4%8.2%
2025-09-27W55.5%33.8%W L82.5%7.8%
2025-10-04L27.7%57.6%67.8%25.6%
2025-10-11W W49%34.2%L84.7%6.4%
2025-10-1854%35.4%W80.7%6%
2025-10-25L20.4%66.5%W85.8%7.3%
2025-11-01W35.2%51.2%W93.8%2.5%
2025-11-08L49.4%30%80.3%11%
2025-11-1520.1%66.2%W82.9%9.2%
2025-11-22L25.5%64.2%W W89.6%4.5%
2025-11-29W48.1%40%85.2%7.8%
2025-12-0641.8%43.2%72.3%12.9%
2025-12-1341.6%45.1%84.4%4.9%
2025-12-20W51.1%37.8%L90.9%3.4%
2025-12-2747.4%41.3%67.6%23.3%
2026-01-0335.8%49.1%87%4.1%
2026-01-1048.9%27.7%85.5%8.1%
2026-01-1743.8%43.8%68.4%5.3%
Reactions from that night · Dec 26
Minnesota

That had to be a media circus....

negativeBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Way cool! Just watched The Shuffle on HBO

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook
New Mexico

Thanks coach for bringing these good kids over and we really appreciate your tenacity and experience in boosting this program.

positiveCoachingFacebook

Let's gooooooo FAM. I believe in you Lil bro Dsean. Go fckn get it. All of you make the state proud . Let's goooooo!!!!! Everyone is a LOBO 🤘

positiveExplicit WordsFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MinnesotaNew Mexico
Harm · MINN +88 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · MINN +64 ptsOff-Field Storylines · MINN +71 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · MINN +11 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Minnesota Harm: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Identity-Based Abuse: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Explicit Language: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota College Sports: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Off-Field Storylines: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Harm: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico College Sports: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Off-Field Storylines: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico Team & Front Office: 57th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Minnesota's positive share was higher in 0 of 22 shared weeks, New Mexico's in 22.

MINNUNM
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MINN, UNM
Week ofMINNUNMComments
2025-08-2354%77.6%1,074
2025-08-3043.6%79.6%831
2025-09-0637.2%92.1%1,132
2025-09-1323.2%85.9%1,024
2025-09-2053.5%78.4%415
2025-09-2755.5%82.5%757
2025-10-0427.7%67.8%1,270
2025-10-1149%84.7%1,004
2025-10-1854%80.7%1,439
2025-10-2520.4%85.8%2,266
2025-11-0135.2%93.8%1,745
2025-11-0849.4%80.3%408
2025-11-1520.1%82.9%1,215
2025-11-2225.5%89.6%1,394
2025-11-2948.1%85.2%3,474
2025-12-0641.8%72.3%1,017
2025-12-1341.6%84.4%235
2025-12-2051.1%90.9%1,707
2025-12-2747.4%67.6%1,870
2026-01-0335.8%87%176
2026-01-1048.9%85.5%109
2026-01-1743.8%68.4%54
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.