Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Michigan
Wolverines
vs
Big 12
West Virginia
Mountaineers
MICH sentiment · 133,763 comments
Positive47.2%
Neutral8.7%
Negative42.2%
Mixed1.8%
WVU sentiment · 31,415 comments
Positive51.6%
Neutral9.6%
Negative37.2%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Michigan
West Virginia

Fan Score

472.1
(better)515.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

47.2%
(better)51.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Michigan
West Virginia

Negativity

422.3
(better)371.6

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

76.4
(better)41.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

52.2
(better)22

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

1.1Race0.2
3.8Gender0.9
1.7LGBTQIA+0.2
1.9Age0.7

Michigan left, West Virginia right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Michigan
West Virginia

Betting talk

3.3
4.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

164.1
130.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

9.6
13.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Michigan up, West Virginia down
Michigan positive ↑West Virginia positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Michigan had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, West Virginia in 15.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Michigan and West Virginia
Week ofMichigan resultMichigan positive shareMichigan negative shareWest Virginia resultWest Virginia positive shareWest Virginia negative share
2025-08-2363%26.6%53.5%28%
2025-08-30W54.9%34.6%W55.9%30.4%
2025-09-06L28.6%63.1%L22%66.7%
2025-09-13W51.1%39.1%W67.3%21.1%
2025-09-20W48.6%41.3%L33.8%55.8%
2025-09-2756.9%27.7%L L34.5%55.2%
2025-10-04W59.4%32.1%36%52.8%
2025-10-11L25.1%66.8%57.5%27.6%
2025-10-18W58.7%32.3%L27.6%61.3%
2025-10-25W52.5%39%L50.1%34.9%
2025-11-01W40.2%49.6%W78.3%14.2%
2025-11-0855.4%31.1%W79.3%11.3%
2025-11-15W43.9%43.3%L49.9%40.9%
2025-11-22W67.2%21.8%71.6%11.8%
2025-11-29L33.5%54.1%L53.8%37.2%
2025-12-0641.2%44.7%70%18.8%
2025-12-1343.6%44.4%86.1%5.6%
2025-12-2052%36.9%93.2%2.3%
2025-12-27L52.8%37.7%80.2%6.9%
2026-01-0356.9%30.5%76.7%9.9%
2026-01-1061%23.3%80.1%8.5%
2026-01-1762.9%24.8%55.8%29.2%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MichiganWest Virginia
Harm · MICH +26 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · MICH +66 ptsExplicit Language · MICH +46 ptsCollege Sports · WVU +42 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WVU +20 ptsSports Betting · WVU +16 ptsTeam & Front Office · MICH +14 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Michigan Harm: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Explicit Language: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan College Sports: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Off-Field Storylines: 48th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Sports Betting: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Michigan Team & Front Office: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Harm: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Identity-Based Abuse: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Explicit Language: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia College Sports: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • West Virginia Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Michigan's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, West Virginia's in 14.

MICHWVU
0%47%93%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MICH, WVU
Week ofMICHWVUComments
2025-08-2363%53.5%4,549
2025-08-3054.9%55.9%11,298
2025-09-0628.6%22%14,661
2025-09-1351.1%67.3%9,401
2025-09-2048.6%33.8%7,703
2025-09-2756.9%34.5%4,341
2025-10-0459.4%36%5,971
2025-10-1125.1%57.5%9,299
2025-10-1858.7%27.6%7,507
2025-10-2552.5%50.1%8,295
2025-11-0140.2%78.3%9,466
2025-11-0855.4%79.3%3,834
2025-11-1543.9%49.9%10,943
2025-11-2267.2%71.6%10,174
2025-11-2933.5%53.8%17,366
2025-12-0641.2%70%4,558
2025-12-1343.6%86.1%3,524
2025-12-2052%93.2%2,832
2025-12-2752.8%80.2%13,234
2026-01-0356.9%76.7%3,539
2026-01-1061%80.1%1,609
2026-01-1762.9%55.8%1,074
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.