Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Michigan State left, Penn State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Michigan State result | Michigan State positive share | Michigan State negative share | Penn State result | Penn State positive share | Penn State negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | W | 73.2% | 17% | – | 56% | 27.5% |
| 2025-08-30 | – | 53.7% | 36.3% | W | 41% | 40.2% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 51.4% | 34.8% | W | 30.7% | 55.6% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 65.4% | 27.8% | W | 32% | 53.6% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 49.3% | 40.1% | – | 37% | 19.1% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 89.3% | 7.3% | L | 21.4% | 67.3% |
| 2025-10-04 | L | 34.3% | 56.9% | L | 16.8% | 71.7% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 20.2% | 71.1% | L | 27.7% | 61.7% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 35.4% | 52.8% | L | 33.5% | 53.4% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 34.1% | 58% | – | 50.5% | 39.5% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 43.9% | 45.7% | L | 39.3% | 48.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | – | 54.7% | 39.4% | L | 32.9% | 46.6% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 33.4% | 57.6% | W | 65.9% | 25.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 31.4% | 59.9% | W | 74.3% | 16.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 50.2% | 39% | W | 45.5% | 42.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 58.1% | 31.1% | – | 60.4% | 25.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 60.3% | 28.3% | – | 72.8% | 16.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 80.4% | 13.4% | – | 68.3% | 18.6% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 51.8% | 36.5% | W | 69.4% | 20.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 59.8% | 30.1% | – | 58.5% | 21.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 56.2% | 35.7% | – | 80.1% | 9% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 41.2% | 46.9% | – | 74.2% | 16.1% |
“R.I.P Michigan State football for awhile. One day maybe they'll have a legit Head Coach again who can turn it around like Dantonio did.”
“Just stop… just win a game… that’s all we care about. Nobody shows up to games or pays season ticket prices for uniforms. You want proof? Just look at the empty seats in the stands on Saturday.”
“I think he'd be the perfect hire for head coach.”
“Please consider this man for head coach! Love him, love his message and heart!”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Michigan State Harm: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State Identity-Based Abuse: 77th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State Explicit Language: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State College Sports: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State Off-Field Storylines: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Michigan State Team & Front Office: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Harm: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Identity-Based Abuse: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Explicit Language: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State College Sports: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Sports Betting: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Penn State Team & Front Office: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Michigan State's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Penn State's in 9.
| Week of | MSU | PSU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 73.2% | 56% | 1,612 |
| 2025-08-30 | 53.7% | 41% | 2,600 |
| 2025-09-06 | 51.4% | 30.7% | 4,173 |
| 2025-09-13 | 65.4% | 32% | 2,330 |
| 2025-09-20 | 49.3% | 37% | 2,722 |
| 2025-09-27 | 89.3% | 21.4% | 6,098 |
| 2025-10-04 | 34.3% | 16.8% | 8,242 |
| 2025-10-11 | 20.2% | 27.7% | 6,974 |
| 2025-10-18 | 35.4% | 33.5% | 4,668 |
| 2025-10-25 | 34.1% | 50.5% | 3,452 |
| 2025-11-01 | 43.9% | 39.3% | 2,522 |
| 2025-11-08 | 54.7% | 32.9% | 2,997 |
| 2025-11-15 | 33.4% | 65.9% | 3,719 |
| 2025-11-22 | 31.4% | 74.3% | 3,131 |
| 2025-11-29 | 50.2% | 45.5% | 6,537 |
| 2025-12-06 | 58.1% | 60.4% | 6,673 |
| 2025-12-13 | 60.3% | 72.8% | 1,880 |
| 2025-12-20 | 80.4% | 68.3% | 1,081 |
| 2025-12-27 | 51.8% | 69.4% | 4,194 |
| 2026-01-03 | 59.8% | 58.5% | 543 |
| 2026-01-10 | 56.2% | 80.1% | 1,302 |
| 2026-01-17 | 41.2% | 74.2% | 786 |