Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

ACC
Miami
Hurricanes
vs
Big Ten
Nebraska
Cornhuskers
MIA sentiment · 61,113 comments
Positive54.8%
Neutral9%
Negative34.3%
Mixed1.9%
NEB sentiment · 47,727 comments
Positive46.6%
Neutral8.9%
Negative42.5%
Mixed2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Miami
Nebraska

Fan Score

548.3 (better)
466

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.8% (better)
46.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Miami
Nebraska

Negativity

342.8 (better)
425.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

47.9 (better)
57.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

54.6
(better)41.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

1.2Race0.6
2.2Gender2.8
0.8Age1.6

Miami left, Nebraska right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Miami
Nebraska

Betting talk

5.1
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

126
135

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4
10.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Miami up, Nebraska down
Miami positive ↑Nebraska positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Miami had the happier comment section in 12 of 22 shared weeks, Nebraska in 10.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Miami and Nebraska
Week ofMiami resultMiami positive shareMiami negative shareNebraska resultNebraska positive shareNebraska negative share
2025-08-2368.9%19.8%W51.4%35.5%
2025-08-30W61.5%25.3%64.1%23.3%
2025-09-06W61.1%26.8%W56%30%
2025-09-13W61.2%21.9%W62.3%25.6%
2025-09-20W51.7%36.7%L34.1%56.3%
2025-09-2766.1%18.8%73.9%17.6%
2025-10-04W57.4%18.6%W55.5%34.5%
2025-10-11L49.6%36.5%W L64.6%24.8%
2025-10-1821.5%68%19.4%71.3%
2025-10-25W40.6%49.6%W49.6%39.6%
2025-11-01L15.5%77.9%L31.3%57.6%
2025-11-08W44.8%45.1%W65.3%24.6%
2025-11-15W64.1%24.3%66.1%18.7%
2025-11-22W53.8%35.6%L L28.6%62%
2025-11-29W67.3%24.2%59.3%32.9%
2025-12-0662.6%29.4%41.5%46.7%
2025-12-1359.4%28.5%48.5%37.1%
2025-12-20W55.3%37.4%74.6%18.6%
2025-12-27W68.2%23.8%L30.2%58.9%
2026-01-03W60.3%30%53.9%30.9%
2026-01-1060%28.6%63.5%24.2%
2026-01-17L54.1%35.7%68%24.8%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MiamiNebraska
Harm · NEB +10 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · NEB +15 ptsExplicit Language · MIA +9 ptsCollege Sports · NEB +64 ptsOff-Field Storylines · MIA +50 ptsSports Betting · MIA +20 ptsTeam & Front Office · NEB +10 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Miami Harm: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Identity-Based Abuse: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Explicit Language: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Off-Field Storylines: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Sports Betting: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Team & Front Office: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Miami's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, Nebraska's in 11.

MIANEB
0%37%75%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MIA, NEB
Week ofMIANEBComments
2025-08-2368.9%51.4%4,357
2025-08-3061.5%64.1%5,557
2025-09-0661.1%56%4,220
2025-09-1361.2%62.3%3,730
2025-09-2051.7%34.1%5,621
2025-09-2766.1%73.9%666
2025-10-0457.4%55.5%5,772
2025-10-1149.6%64.6%4,414
2025-10-1821.5%19.4%5,977
2025-10-2540.6%49.6%4,661
2025-11-0115.5%31.3%6,460
2025-11-0844.8%65.3%5,285
2025-11-1564.1%66.1%1,803
2025-11-2253.8%28.6%6,905
2025-11-2967.3%59.3%3,858
2025-12-0662.6%41.5%3,201
2025-12-1359.4%48.5%1,608
2025-12-2055.3%74.6%3,895
2025-12-2768.2%30.2%10,463
2026-01-0360.3%53.9%7,120
2026-01-1060%63.5%3,625
2026-01-1754.1%68%9,642
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.