Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

American
Memphis
Tigers
vs
Sun Belt
Southern Miss
Golden Eagles
MEM sentiment · 12,047 comments
Positive70.3%
Neutral10%
Negative18.3%
Mixed1.4%
USM sentiment · 6,305 comments
Positive73.6%
Neutral10.4%
Negative14.9%
Mixed1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Memphis
Southern Miss

Fan Score

703.4
(better)736.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

70.3%
(better)73.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Memphis
Southern Miss

Negativity

183.3
(better)149.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

23.5
(better)16.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

6.6 (better)
7.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Memphis left, Southern Miss right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Memphis
Southern Miss

Betting talk

2.7
2.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

134.4
144.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.3
7.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Memphis up, Southern Miss down
Memphis positive ↑Southern Miss positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Memphis had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss in 15.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Memphis and Southern Miss
Week ofMemphis resultMemphis positive shareMemphis negative shareSouthern Miss resultSouthern Miss positive shareSouthern Miss negative share
2025-08-2373.5%12.6%58%16.5%
2025-08-30W67.9%14%L65.9%22%
2025-09-06W73.2%15.7%W73%15.4%
2025-09-13W69%16%W81.7%9.7%
2025-09-20W69.3%20.7%L60.7%24%
2025-09-27W73.4%12.6%W83%6.7%
2025-10-04W84.6%7.7%W80%10.5%
2025-10-1157%22.1%84.8%10.9%
2025-10-18L62.3%26.2%W85%5.6%
2025-10-25W W78.7%11.5%W89.3%5.6%
2025-11-01L70.6%14.7%77.5%10.8%
2025-11-0856.7%32.8%W79.8%9.2%
2025-11-15L55.9%32.3%L63.5%28.9%
2025-11-22L72%16.9%L64.1%27.1%
2025-11-2941.7%40.1%L68.9%16.4%
2025-12-0672.8%18.2%63.2%22.7%
2025-12-13L67.2%22.5%87.1%7.1%
2025-12-2072.5%16.5%L75.1%19%
2025-12-2768.8%22.2%75.2%19%
2026-01-0362.4%27.5%83.3%4.2%
2026-01-1067.1%21.3%80%10%
2026-01-1790.6%4.2%65.5%3.4%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MemphisSouthern Miss
Harm · MEM +18 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · USM +5 ptsCollege Sports · USM +23 ptsOff-Field Storylines · MEM +9 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · USM +7 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Memphis Harm: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis College Sports: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Off-Field Storylines: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Sports Betting: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Memphis's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss's in 14.

MEMUSM
0%45%91%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MEM, USM
Week ofMEMUSMComments
2025-08-2373.5%58%771
2025-08-3067.9%65.9%1,311
2025-09-0673.2%73%814
2025-09-1369%81.7%993
2025-09-2069.3%60.7%2,331
2025-09-2773.4%83%723
2025-10-0484.6%80%967
2025-10-1157%84.8%456
2025-10-1862.3%85%571
2025-10-2578.7%89.3%1,448
2025-11-0170.6%77.5%549
2025-11-0856.7%79.8%804
2025-11-1555.9%63.5%345
2025-11-2272%64.1%520
2025-11-2941.7%68.9%555
2025-12-0672.8%63.2%2,749
2025-12-1367.2%87.1%1,002
2025-12-2072.5%75.1%471
2025-12-2768.8%75.2%281
2026-01-0362.4%83.3%173
2026-01-1067.1%80%224
2026-01-1790.6%65.5%294
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.