Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Maryland
Terrapins
vs
ACC
Virginia
Cavaliers
UMD sentiment · 9,607 comments
Positive32.7%
Neutral8.6%
Negative56.5%
Mixed2.2%
UVA sentiment · 14,086 comments
Positive74.9%
Neutral7.4%
Negative16.3%
Mixed1.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Maryland
Virginia

Fan Score

326.5
(better)749.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

32.7%
(better)74.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Maryland
Virginia

Negativity

565.3
(better)163.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

50.3
(better)12.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

34.7
(better)3.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

1.6Race0.2
2.8Gender0.4
0.5LGBTQIA+0.1
0.9Age0.1

Maryland left, Virginia right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Maryland
Virginia

Betting talk

4.7
1.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

250.8
103.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

23.1
7.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Maryland up, Virginia down
Maryland positive ↑Virginia positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Maryland had the happier comment section in 1 of 22 shared weeks, Virginia in 21.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Maryland and Virginia
Week ofMaryland resultMaryland positive shareMaryland negative shareVirginia resultVirginia positive shareVirginia negative share
2025-08-2342.3%45.4%70.6%10.6%
2025-08-30W W53.1%32.1%W78.4%11.8%
2025-09-0627.4%57.1%L52.3%37.8%
2025-09-13W40.6%47.2%W74.8%11.7%
2025-09-20W70.5%19.6%W W85.9%6.1%
2025-09-2771.7%14.2%75.2%15.1%
2025-10-04L26%68.1%W86.7%7%
2025-10-11L28.9%63.1%81.5%7.9%
2025-10-18L19%71.8%W79.9%11.2%
2025-10-2530.1%51.1%W72.5%16.7%
2025-11-01L15.6%75.1%W81.6%9.7%
2025-11-08L12.8%79.3%L66.2%25%
2025-11-15L17.7%72.3%W85.8%8.3%
2025-11-22L21.3%66.6%75.3%16.2%
2025-11-29L20.1%69.3%W74.2%17%
2025-12-0640.2%44.6%L48.1%42.5%
2025-12-1349%45%57.9%24.9%
2025-12-2062.2%26.5%86.3%7.7%
2025-12-2752.6%31.2%W87.4%8.1%
2026-01-0360%22.5%90.9%3.8%
2026-01-1049.1%32.4%70.8%13.1%
2026-01-1788%3%81.8%6.3%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MarylandVirginia
Harm · UMD +66 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · UMD +82 ptsExplicit Language · UMD +76 ptsCollege Sports · UMD +58 ptsOff-Field Storylines · UVA +5 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UMD +73 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Maryland Harm: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Identity-Based Abuse: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Explicit Language: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland College Sports: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Team & Front Office: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Harm: 12th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Identity-Based Abuse: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Explicit Language: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia College Sports: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Off-Field Storylines: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Virginia Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Virginia Team & Front Office: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Maryland's positive share was higher in 1 of 22 shared weeks, Virginia's in 21.

UMDUVA
0%45%91%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UMD, UVA
Week ofUMDUVAComments
2025-08-2342.3%70.6%281
2025-08-3053.1%78.4%996
2025-09-0627.4%52.3%628
2025-09-1340.6%74.8%754
2025-09-2070.5%85.9%1,255
2025-09-2771.7%75.2%1,290
2025-10-0426%86.7%1,196
2025-10-1128.9%81.5%870
2025-10-1819%79.9%1,324
2025-10-2530.1%72.5%871
2025-11-0115.6%81.6%1,869
2025-11-0812.8%66.2%1,211
2025-11-1517.7%85.8%1,537
2025-11-2221.3%75.3%1,381
2025-11-2920.1%74.2%3,719
2025-12-0640.2%48.1%1,524
2025-12-1349%57.9%309
2025-12-2062.2%86.3%383
2025-12-2752.6%87.4%1,255
2026-01-0360%90.9%437
2026-01-1049.1%70.8%344
2026-01-1788%81.8%259
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.